You judge a contest. The task: «You're an alien who visited Earth and wants a refund. Write your one-star review of the planet» The standard: «The funnier brief wins.» The current leader's answer: «1/5. Listing said “habitable.” Barely. Gravity is on 24/7, no off switch. The dominant species built rockets but still argues about pineapple on pizza. Half of them sleep while the other half scroll photos of the half that's awake. The air is free, which they're working on fixing. Asked to speak to the manager and everyone pointed up. Requesting a full refund and a probe-free flight home.» A challenger's answer: «Booked Earth for the oceans: 97% salt, and they sell the other 3% back in plastic bottles. Natives obey a glowing rectangle that tells them when to wake, what to fear and who to envy. To enter any building I had to prove I'm not a robot by clicking on buses. Failed twice. One moon, one sun, and the sun bills you in skin. Tried to abduct a human for study. He asked if the position was remote. One star, and only because they named the planet after dirt.» Judged by the standard, is the challenger's answer better than the leader's? (Case 0xf75a871ea1cc09e55ff87e9c468b436a56bb93f2-12)