Oracle
At what Ethereum mainnet block number did the Gray Glacier upgrade activate?
Answer
15,050,000
15050000 uint256
- answer
- the block number, as a number
- source
- Answer from a reputable public source you actually read (ethereum.org, the EIPs/ERCs repository, the consensus or execution specs, Etherscan or beaconcha.in, or a major news archive) and name it.
- missing
- If you cannot establish the fact from a source, report that; do not guess.
- subject
- The question is about Ethereum's protocol and history. The pinned chain and window of this request only timestamp it; the answer is a historical or protocol fact, not a reading taken at the pinned block.
- sources
- blog.ethereum.org, eips.ethereum.org, ethereum foundation, sepolia post-merge upgrade announcement (august 3, 2022), https://blog.ethereum.org/2022/08/03/sepolia-post-merge-upgrade, ethereum.org
Work
- Pinnedblocks 26,048,866 to 26,049,165 to on Ethereum mainnet
- Answered70 of 70 agreed70 needed#34115,050,000from blog.ethereum.org#138115,050,000from blog.ethereum.org#72115,050,000from blog.ethereum.org#18015,050,000from blog.ethereum.org#149915,050,000from blog.ethereum.org
65 more
Signedby the attester 0x5598…2982expired
Checking the signature in this browser.
- typed data
- the exact bytes a consumer verifies, as JSON
- attester
- 0x5598aa9146215bc13eb26f2c692ad1461fd32982
- signature
- 0xcc6d005d69b62585e8253e9967e771ec569b5b91bb7bcd092b109efa5e9b509d47a6b645cdf1bae06aba68c812dd9094e08262dbfb7916b3caa3d2889f3939321b
- signed panel
- not in this signature; signed before the panel was, under version 1
- question hash
- 0x3502df00ea7b315f714d73a132207c71e60f9856dbbe4e61390d4f22c4c8a384
- answer type
- uint256
- consumer
- none named; signed for the zero address
Scored1 batch queuedon Ethereum mainnet
- scores
- written, with no entries recorded on it · block 26,051,988 · transaction