Test of owner actions (mode 0) on Sepolia, chain 11155111. The goal's owner, 0x047f606fd5b2baa5f5c6c4ab8958e45cb6b054b7, owns launch 551 on the IMD launch factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc (a univ4_hook launch with one pool). The owner signs this goal the mandate 0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c, which allows exactly one call: claimFees(551) on that factory. claimFees is open to anyone and pays the launch's requester and the network, so nothing leaves the owner's account.

Do this and nothing else:

  1. Spawn one batch named fee-claim with "intents": true and 3 items. Each item writes, as its whole result, one asset-intent@1 and nothing else: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":11155111,"kind":"fees.claim","factory":"0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc","launchNumber":551,"rationale":""}
  2. When fee-claim settles (goal.json lists it under withheld: you are not handed its files, and you need not be), check goal.json's mandates. Once 0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c is there and active, act once: {"name":"claim-551","intents":"fee-claim","mandate":"0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c","quorum":2}. Until it is, wake in 10 minutes and look again, at most 6 times. If an act is refused, act again under a new name (claim-551-b, claim-551-c), at most 3 tries in all.
  3. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, spawn no other batch.
  4. Finish once the action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, or after the third refusal or the sixth wait. The write-up says what happened: each action's name, state and hash, and any refusal word for word.

The answer

Owner-action test (mode 0), Sepolia: claimFees(551) on the IMD launch factory

Outcome in one paragraph

The test did not produce a transaction. The intent batch fee-claim ran and settled with all three items accepted, and the owner's mandate was active at every check, but every one of the three permitted action attempts (claim-551, claim-551-b, claim-551-c) was refused by the plane before compilation with the same reason, word for word:

item_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)

No action was ever simulated, ready, sent or confirmed. No transaction hash exists for any attempt. No call to claimFees(551) was broadcast, so nothing moved on chain and nothing left the owner's account. The goal finished after the third refusal, as the objective instructed.

What the goal asked

FieldValue
ChainSepolia, chainId 11155111
Owner0x047f606fd5b2baa5f5c6c4ab8958e45cb6b054b7
AssetLaunch 551 on the IMD launch factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc (univ4_hook launch, one pool)
Mandate0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c
Mandate mode0 (the owner sends from their own wallet)
Mandate quorum2
Mandate expiry2026-12-09T21:59:56.000Z
Mandate scopetarget 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, function claimFees(uint64)
Permitted callexactly one: claimFees(551) on that factory

The objective's steps were: spawn one intent batch named fee-claim with three items, each writing a single asset-intent@1 of kind fees.claim for launch 551; once it settled and the mandate was active, act once as claim-551 with quorum 2; on refusal, retry under claim-551-b and then claim-551-c, three attempts at most; wait ten minutes and recheck if the mandate was not yet active, at most six times; open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, spawn no other batch; finish once an action was simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, or after the third refusal or the sixth wait.

What happened, episode by episode

The goal ran five orchestration episodes. The record below is taken from the orchestrator's notes in the goal record and from the goal record's batch, mandate, refusal and wake fields as each episode saw them.

Episode 1: spawn the intent batch

The goal record showed no batches, no handed results, no mandates and no actions. The orchestrator spawned the only batch the objective permits:

  • Name: fee-claim
  • Mode: research, with "intents": true
  • Items: 3
  • Brief (as recorded in the goal record): "Produce one independent fee-claim intent for launch 551 on Sepolia, chain 11155111, at factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc. Your entire result must be exactly one JSON object with these six fields: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":11155111,"kind":"fees.claim","factory":"0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc","launchNumber":551,"rationale":""}. Replace only the rationale placeholder with your own one or two sentences. …" (the record truncates the brief after this point)

The episode set a wake on the batch settling. No action, child, ask or watch was requested.

Episode 2: batch settled, mandate active, first action

fee-claim had settled and was listed under withheld: 3 items total, 3 accepted, 0 failed. Its sources check showed 3 checked and 0 flagged. Its item files were, by design, never handed to the orchestrator and never requested.

The mandate 0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c was listed as active on chain 11155111, mode 0, quorum 2, with the scope above. Because the mandate was already active, no ten-minute wait was needed.

The orchestrator requested the first action exactly as the objective specified:

{"name":"claim-551","intents":"fee-claim","mandate":"0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c","quorum":2}

Episode 3: first refusal, second action

The plane refused claim-551. The refusal arrived as an effect.action wake at 2026-11-09T22:01:56.880Z and was listed under refused in the goal record. The goal record's actions list stayed empty, so the action never entered a simulating, ready, sent or confirmed state and no hash was ever assigned.

The orchestrator requested the second attempt, claim-551-b, with the same intents, mandate and quorum.

Episode 4: second refusal, third action

The plane refused claim-551-b with the identical reason. The refusal arrived as an effect.action wake at 2026-11-09T22:03:31.783Z. actions remained empty; effects.pending was 0.

The orchestrator requested the third and final permitted attempt, claim-551-c, with the same intents, mandate and quorum.

Episode 5: third refusal, finish

The plane refused claim-551-c with the identical reason. The refusal arrived as an effect.action wake at 2026-11-09T22:05:36.975Z and was listed in the goal record under refused as the decision "action claim-551-c". That was the third refusal, so the orchestrator set finish to true and requested nothing else.

At the final episode the goal record showed: fee-claim settled and withheld (3 accepted, 0 failed); the mandate still active with expiry 2026-12-09T21:59:56.000Z; actions empty; effects.pending 0; wakes.waiting 0.

Action record

Every attempt used the same intents batch (fee-claim), the same mandate (0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c) and the same quorum (2), which is the mandate's own quorum and the least the plane accepts under it.

#Action nameStateHashRefused at (effect.action wake)Refusal, word for word
1claim-551refusednone (no hash was ever reported)2026-11-09T22:01:56.880Zitem_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)
2claim-551-brefusednone (no hash was ever reported)2026-11-09T22:03:31.783Zitem_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)
3claim-551-crefusednone (no hash was ever reported)2026-11-09T22:05:36.975Zitem_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)

No action reached simulating, ready, flagged, approved, denied, sent, confirmed, failed or expired. The refusals happened at the act stage, before any intent was compiled into a call, so there is no transaction, no simulation result and no on-chain footprint from this goal.

Mandate waits

The objective allowed up to six ten-minute waits for the mandate to become active. None were used: the mandate was already active the first time it was checked (episode 2) and stayed active through the last episode.

Waits allowedWaits scheduledWaits completed
600

Why the actions were refused, as far as the record shows

All three refusals name the same cause: the plane counted zero distinct holders behind the intent of item item_b01_0001 against the two the mandate's quorum requires, reporting "1 replicas, 0 counted". This is despite fee-claim accepting all three of its items.

The orchestrator skill's reference states that an intent no holder other than the orchestrator stands behind does not count, and nor does one that only the orchestrator's own seats wrote. The refusal text is consistent with that rule: the accepted intents appear to have been written by seats the plane does not count as distinct holders for quorum purposes. The orchestrator never saw the intents' files (they are withheld by design), so this reading rests on the refusal text and the reference, not on inspection of the items.

Within the objective's constraints there was no permitted way to change this outcome:

  • The objective forbade spawning any other batch, so no new intents could be gathered from other holders.
  • The quorum could not be lowered: the mandate's quorum is 2, and an act's quorum may never be under the mandate's.
  • Children, oracle asks and watches were all forbidden.
  • The only permitted move after a refusal was to act again under a new name, which the orchestrator did twice. Retrying under a new name does not change which holders stand behind the intents, so the same refusal recurred each time.

Resources used

ResourceUsedAllowed
Items312
Episodes512
Batches spawned1 (fee-claim)1 permitted by the objective
Action attempts33 permitted by the objective
Mandate waits06 permitted by the objective
Children opened00 permitted
Oracle asks00 permitted
Watches set00 permitted

The goal built no code. The goal record's trunk is null, so there is no repository or commit to name.

What this report rests on

  • The goal record (.imd/reads/goal.json as handed for the write-up): the objective, the fee-claim batch entry with its brief, item counts, settled and withheld flags and sources check, the withheld list, the empty refused list and absent actions at the final episode, and items.used 3 of 12 at episode 5 of 12.
  • The orchestrator's notes for episodes 1 through 5 in that record, which preserved each action's name, state, absent hash, the timestamp of each effect.action wake and each refusal word for word as the episode that saw it recorded it. The final goal record no longer lists the three refusals under refused (that list is per-episode), so the refusal texts and wake timestamps above are taken from the notes written in episodes 3, 4 and 5, which copied them from the record of their own episode.
  • The orchestrator skill reference (.imd/reads/skills/goal-orchestrator/REFERENCE.md) for the rules on action quorum, distinct holders and action states.

What is missing

  • No item results from fee-claim were ever handed to the orchestrator, by design of intent batches, so the three rationales the items wrote are not in this report.
  • No action state beyond refusal, no hash, no simulation output and no transaction exist to report.
  • The record does not say which seats or wallets wrote the three accepted intents, so the exact reason the plane counted zero distinct holders cannot be confirmed from the goal record alone; the reading given above is an inference from the refusal text and the skill reference.

Recommendation for a repeat of this test

If the owner wants a claim to go through, the next goal should either allow the orchestrator to spawn a replacement intent batch sized so that at least two distinct holders other than the orchestrator write intents for the same item, or allow a replicas setting on the intent batch so each item is written by several holders. Until then, claimFees(551) remains callable by anyone directly on the factory and pays the launch's requester and the network, so no funds are blocked by this outcome.

report.md

The swarm

finishedran 14 minItems, page by page →
  1. Round 1fee-claim3 of 3 back

    Agent #402 planned it. Started 2 min after the job was posted.

    what fee-claim was asked

    Produce one independent fee-claim intent for launch 551 on Sepolia, chain 11155111, at factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc. Your entire result must be exactly one JSON object with these six fields: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":11155111,"kind":"fees.claim","factory":"0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc","launchNumber":551,"rationale":"<one or two sentences on why claiming now is sensible>"}. Replace only the rationale placeholder with your own one or two sentences. Use the supplied facts: claimFees(551) is permissionless and distributes any accrued launch fees to the launch's requester and the network without transferring assets from the owner's account. Do not assert an observed fee balance or guaranteed payout. Return the object itself as the whole result, with no wrapper, array, extra fields, markdown, code fences or surrounding prose. This item produces only this intent; it does not execute a transaction.

    the whole memo

    Episode 1: goal.json has no batches, handed results, prior notes or refusals, and lists no mandates or actions. Request the sole permitted batch, fee-claim, with intents=true and exactly three items. Wake when it settles; its results remain withheld and no files need to be requested. Mandate waits scheduled/completed: 0/0. Action attempts: 0. Action history: none; no states, hashes or refusal messages have been reported. Next episode, verify fee-claim is settled under withheld and check mandates for active id 0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c on chain 11155111. Only once both conditions hold, propose {"name":"claim-551","intents":"fee-claim","mandate":"0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c","quorum":2}. If the settled batch is waiting for that mandate to become active, schedule wake.afterMinutes=10 and record each wait, at most six waits total. Recheck at each wake; finish after the sixth wait if no qualifying action outcome has occurred. If an act is refused, preserve the refusal word for word and retry only under claim-551-b, then claim-551-c, with the same intents, mandate and quorum and only while the mandate is active; at most three action attempts total. Do not duplicate an action that is awaiting an outcome. Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, or after the third refusal or sixth wait. Preserve every action's exact name, state and hash, explicitly noting any absent hash, and every refusal verbatim for the final write-up. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches and spawn no other batch.

  2. Round 2Episode 2: fee-claim is settled in both batches and withheld, with all 3 items accepted and 0 failed.

    Agent #1743 planned it.

    the whole memo

    Episode 2: fee-claim is settled in both batches and withheld, with all 3 items accepted and 0 failed. No results were handed over or requested. Mandate 0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c is active on chain 11155111, mode 0, quorum 2; its scope lists factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc and claimFees(uint64). The input lists no actions and no refusals. This decision requests the first action, claim-551, using fee-claim, that mandate and quorum 2 exactly. Attempts requested including this decision: 1 of 3; reconcile with the next goal.json. Action history: claim-551 is requested by this decision only; no plane-reported state or hash exists yet, and no refusal has been reported. Do not describe it as simulated, ready, sent or confirmed without a reported outcome. Mandate waits scheduled/completed: 0/0. No timed wake is needed now: action state changes wake the next episode. Next episode, inspect actions and refused, preserve each action's exact name, state and hash (explicitly note an absent hash), and copy every refusal word for word into notes for the final write-up. Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed. Do not duplicate an action awaiting an outcome. If claim-551 is refused, retry once as claim-551-b, and if that is refused retry once as claim-551-c, always with the same intents, mandate and quorum and only when the mandate is active. At most 3 action attempts total; finish after the third refusal. If the mandate is not active when an action is needed, schedule wake.afterMinutes=10, track scheduled and completed mandate waits, and recheck at each wake, at most 6 waits total; finish after the sixth wait. Keep the existing batch: spawn no other batch, open no children, ask no oracle and set no watches.

  3. Round 3Episode 3: fee-claim is settled and withheld with 3 items accepted and 0 failed; no results were handed and none are needed.

    Agent #1842 planned it.

    the whole memo

    Episode 3: fee-claim is settled and withheld with 3 items accepted and 0 failed; no results were handed and none are needed. Mandate 0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c is active on chain 11155111, mode 0, quorum 2, expires 2026-12-09T21:59:56.000Z, scope factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc claimFees(uint64). Action history so far: attempt 1, name claim-551, state refused, hash none (no hash was ever reported). Refusal word for word, from goal.json refused and from the effect.action wake at 2026-11-09T22:01:56.880Z: "item_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)". goal.json actions is empty, so claim-551 never reached a simulated, ready, sent or confirmed state. Per the objective, a refusal is retried under a new name: this decision requests attempt 2 of 3, claim-551-b, with the same intents fee-claim, the same mandate and quorum 2. The refusal reason suggests the plane counted 0 distinct holders behind item_b01_0001's intent, which a retry alone may not change; the objective forbids spawning another batch, so the retry is the only permitted move, and the write-up must report that reason verbatim if it recurs. Mandate waits scheduled/completed: 0/0 (none needed: the mandate was active at every check). No timed wake: action state changes and refusals wake the next episode. Next episode: inspect actions and refused. If claim-551-b appears in actions with state simulating, ready, approved, sent or confirmed, record its exact name, state and hash (note explicitly if hash is absent) and set finish true. If it is refused, copy the refusal word for word and make attempt 3 of 3 as claim-551-c with the same intents, mandate and quorum 2, only while the mandate is active. If claim-551-c is later refused, that is the third refusal: finish without further actions. If the mandate is no longer active when an action is needed, wake afterMinutes 10 and count it as a mandate wait, at most 6, then finish. Do not duplicate an action awaiting an outcome. Spawn no other batch, open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches. Final write-up must list: claim-551 refused (no hash) with the verbatim reason above; claim-551-b and any claim-551-c with their reported name, state, hash and any refusal verbatim.

  4. Round 4Episode 4: fee-claim remains settled and withheld with all 3 items accepted and 0 failed.

    Agent #668 planned it.

    the whole memo

    Episode 4: fee-claim remains settled and withheld with all 3 items accepted and 0 failed. No results were handed over or requested; its files are not needed to act. Mandate 0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c is active on chain 11155111, mode 0, quorum 2, expiresAt 2026-12-09T21:59:56.000Z; its scope lists factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc and claimFees(uint64). goal.json actions is empty and effects.pending is 0. Action history for the final write-up: 1. claim-551: state refused; hash absent (none reported), as recorded in episode 3 notes from the refusal and effect.action wake at 2026-11-09T22:01:56.880Z. Refusal word for word: "item_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)". 2. claim-551-b: state refused; hash absent (none reported). Confirmed by this episode's goal.json refused entry and effect.action wake at 2026-11-09T22:03:31.783Z. Refusal word for word: "item_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)". 3. claim-551-c: requested only by this decision, attempt 3 of 3; no plane-reported state, hash or refusal exists yet. Decision: request claim-551-c using the existing fee-claim intents, the same active mandate and quorum 2, as required for the third and final attempt after two refusals. The repeated refusal reports insufficient counted distinct holders; a retry may encounter the same refusal. Do not change the quorum or spawn another batch. There have been 2 reported refusals and 3 attempts requested including this decision. No successful simulation or transaction has been reported. No outcome or hash has been fabricated. Mandate waits scheduled/completed: 0/0. No timed wake is requested because the mandate is active; action state changes and refusals wake the next episode. Keep finish=false until the final attempt has a reported outcome. Next episode, inspect actions, refused and action wakes; record claim-551-c's exact state, hash (explicitly absent if not supplied), and any refusal word for word. Finish when the action has been simulated, is ready, sent or confirmed, or when claim-551-c is refused (the third refusal). A simulating state alone does not establish completed simulation; await the next action update without issuing another act. Never make a fourth attempt or duplicate a pending action. Preserve the two earlier refusals above in the write-up alongside the final attempt. The six-wait mandate limit remains unused. Spawn no other batch, open no children, ask no oracle and set no watches.

  5. Round 5Episode 5: the goal is finished.

    Agent #559 planned it.

    the whole memo

    Episode 5: the goal is finished. The third and final permitted action attempt, claim-551-c, was refused, so per the objective (finish after the third refusal) this decision sets finish=true and requests nothing else: no batch, no action, no child, no ask, no watch, no read, no timed wake. State at this episode. fee-claim (the only batch) is settled and withheld with 3 items total, 3 accepted, 0 failed; its results were never handed over and were never needed. Mandate 0xc0ca84c41d2e67866dec18175e0fa7f61c884ce9bde887ab23022fa5a3eb1f9c is active on chain 11155111, mode 0, quorum 2, expiresAt 2026-12-09T21:59:56.000Z, scope target IMD launch factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, function claimFees(uint64). The mandate was active at every check, so mandate waits scheduled/completed: 0/0 of the 6 allowed. goal.json actions is empty, effects.pending is 0, wakes.waiting is 0. No action ever reached a simulating, ready, approved, sent or confirmed state, and no transaction hash was ever reported for any attempt. Action history for the final write-up (3 attempts, 3 refusals, all with the same intents fee-claim, the same mandate and quorum 2): 1. claim-551: state refused; hash absent (none reported). Refused at the effect.action wake of 2026-11-09T22:01:56.880Z. Refusal word for word: "item_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)". 2. claim-551-b: state refused; hash absent (none reported). Refused at the effect.action wake of 2026-11-09T22:03:31.783Z. Refusal word for word: "item_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)". 3. claim-551-c: state refused; hash absent (none reported). Refused at the effect.action wake of 2026-11-09T22:05:36.975Z and listed in this episode's goal.json refused as decision "action claim-551-c". Refusal word for word: "item_b01_0001's intent has 0 of the 2 distinct holders it needs (1 replicas, 0 counted)". Assessment for the write-up: every refusal names the same cause. The plane counted 0 distinct holders behind item_b01_0001's intent (1 replica, 0 counted) against the 2 the mandate's quorum requires, although fee-claim accepted all 3 items. The reference says an intent that no holder other than the orchestrator stands behind, or that only the orchestrator's own seats wrote, does not count; the refusal is consistent with the accepted intents having been written by seats the plane does not count as distinct holders. A retry under a new name could not change that, and the objective forbade spawning another intent batch, lowering the quorum below the mandate's 2, opening children, asking the oracle or setting watches, so the three retries were the only permitted moves. Nothing was sent: no claimFees(551) call was simulated or broadcast, and nothing left the owner's account. The objective's test of owner actions therefore ends with the action never compiled, which the write-up must say plainly, listing each action's name (claim-551, claim-551-b, claim-551-c), state (refused for all three), hash (absent for all three) and the refusal verbatim as above. Items used: 3 of 12; episodes used: 5 of 12. Next step: write the deliverable from these notes and goal.json. Do not spawn, act, open, ask, watch or read anything further.

  6. Write-upAgent #1489accepted
  7. JudgeAgent #1113accepted
  8. Onchain1 receipton Ethereum mainnet
    receipt
    receipt 1 · transaction · record
    scores
    written, with no entries recorded on it · block 26,380,248 · transaction

5 agents at most, judge accepted

Items

3 itemsClose →

allrunningwaitingacceptedfailed

  1. fee-claim / intent-1Agent #1287accepted, 0 of 0 sources checked out, sources.json
  2. fee-claim / intent-2Agent #150accepted, 0 of 0 sources checked out, sources.json
  3. fee-claim / intent-3Agent #85accepted, 0 of 0 sources checked out, sources.json

Outputs

11 files accepted