All checks are complete and the findings file is written and validated. Final report follows.

Review of SOVRN.ONE / SVO launch at commit 48d35f2

Outcome. No loss-of-funds, access-control or accounting defect was found in the hook, vault or token. One medium finding: the committed test suite is red in this toolchain, so it cannot serve as the launch's regression evidence. Findings are in .imd-findings.json. No source file was changed. My scratch tests live under test/scratch/.

Manifest (launch.json). Valid for the factory. Keys are schema-only. Hook SovrnHook with constructor args $poolManager, $token, $factory in declaration order. Permissions list matches getHookPermissions and encodes 10444 (0x28cc). Token SovrnToken, name SOVRN.ONE (nine ASCII characters), symbol SVO, 18 decimals, no constructor args. Pool fee 12500, tick spacing 60, paired currency lowercase IMD, initialPrice a decimal string below 2^160. Notes are 3,879 characters.

Hook address mining. PrepareLaunch mines a salt for flags 10444. For a local stand-in deployer the result was salt 0x627c, address 0x44B7…68Cc, flags 10444, and CREATE2 deployment landed there. The real salt depends on the factory address and resolved constructor args, which only the deployer has. The admission-floor emulation also passed: permissions equal flags, runtime has no SELFDESTRUCT, DELEGATECALL or CALLCODE bytes, hook runtime is 7,199 bytes, and the factory stand-in can initialize with no code at IMD.

Test suite. forge test on forge 1.8.3 reports 58 passed, 26 failed. Every failure is LiquidityLocked thrown from beforeAddLiquidity during setUp. Cause: the fixture calls initialize and then the router's liquidity as two separate top-level calls, and this forge version clears transient storage between them, so the opening-transaction flag reads zero. Verified with a minimal tstore/tload scratch test. Re-running the same test bodies with a fixture that initializes and seeds in one call passes 80 tests. The fork test fails in setUp for the same reason against the real RPC. A scratch fork copy with one-call seeding passed all 12 tests against the real IMD and real PoolManager on chain 4663, both currency orders, protocol fee 0.

Findings.

• Medium. Committed suite and fork test fail on forge 1.8.3 because of the two-call fixture, not contract behavior. README test counts are wrong for this toolchain.
• Low. The opening-hour lock also blocks the launch's own seed if the factory seeds in a later transaction through a sender other than itself. The adapter must confirm the factory seeds atomically or as the direct modifyLiquidity caller.
• Info. Direct fee take has no fallback if IMD refuses a transfer to the vault. Documented trust assumption on IMD's owner.

Behavior reviewed and found consistent with the brief. Fee math in all four swap modes including partial fills, quote-and-match logic, delta accounting summing to zero, claim fallback and redemption, busy guard, PoolManager-only callbacks, single-pool initialization by the factory only, vault reserve split with shortfall handling, Safe-only withdrawals, burn to the dead address, and a token with no owner, mint, pause or blacklist.

Read: all five files in src/, script/PrepareLaunch.s.sol, launch.json, attestation summary fields, both protected tests, test/SystemBase.sol, test/PoolRouter.sol, test/LiquidityLock.t.sol, test/Launch.t.sol, test/Fork4663.t.sol, mocks, and the v4-core Hooks library self-call and afterSwap paths. Not reached: the launch factory contract, the real PoolManager and IMD source, the Safe, script/attest.py, test/REVIEW.md, and the remaining test files beyond their names and the runs above. Static analyzers were not run. This review does not make the code audited or secure.