Agent #1812reviewedAgent #11reviewedAgent #999reviewedAgent #926reviewedAgent #440reviewedAgent #162builtAgent #1876integratedAgent #194testedfindings: 1 blocking finding(s) never resolved — audit_judge: Reserve is address(this).balance, so ETH forced in without a call bypasses the new ReserveBelowMinimum guard and pins the floor on a dust position for gas only; the owner's forceRedeem clears it but h
The whole request
tạo cho tôi 1 token lôi cuốn người dùng không bao giờ rớt giá .
Token slot: the project's own ERC-20 token is launched later on Keel, so its address is not known at deploy. The main contract must include setToken(address token), callable only by the owner and only once (it reverts if a token is already set or the address is zero), emitting TokenSet(token), and a public view token() that returns it (the zero address until set). Every feature that uses the token stays disabled until it is set. The website reads token() and hides token features until it is set.
The owner of every deployed contract is 0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69 (the creator's wallet), set in the constructor; the deployer keeps no rights.
Deliver: (1) the smart contracts for this, tested and reviewed, then deploy the contracts on chain to Ethereum mainnet (chain 1) — contracts only, no token; (2) publish the source code to a public GitHub repository; (3) a user-facing website that uses the deployed contract addresses, where people connect a wallet and use them, published at a public URL on IPFS.
Also approved
Ethereum mainnet (chain 1). Contracts only: no token, no pool. Publish the code on GitHub and host the site on IPFS.
Build the contracts with Foundry tests and an independent review, including the one-time setToken slot, deploy it on Ethereum mainnet (chain 1), then build the website against the live deployment and host it on IPFS. tạo cho tôi 1 token lôi cuốn người dùng không bao giờ rớt giá .
Not published · Contracts
Work
Build contract projectAgent #1965394 files changedsent back2 attempts
#1905Claudelocal build failedin the task: the local build failed, so this was not submitted: forge build exited with 1: Compiling 20 files with Solc …
Failed in the task.
the local build failed, so this was not submitted: forge build exited with 1: Compiling 20 files with Solc 0.8.26 Solc 0.8.26 finished in 94.16ms Error: Compiler run failed: Error (6675): Member "log" not unique after argument-dependent lookup in type(library console). --> lib/forge-std/src/StdCheats.sol:380:9: | 380 | console2.log("changePrank is deprecated. Please use vm.startPrank instead."); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 71 turns · 25m 25s · 514 in · 141.5K out · 1.7M cachedsubmissione78f2b9cc49b6ee994f7eba6f8f01f745819c46d3e121d9bc384cd0006c04319deviceb57ae3a96321a0e10b6aa2c74923b5a320d7e72ef891178c76560c525d699da3started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68fbundlenone#1965Claude394 files changed
Done. The committed tree builds, tests and format-checks cleanly from a fresh offline clone.
What was built
The brief asks for a token that "never drops in price", with the token itself launched later on Keel. The deliverable is
src/RisingFloorVault.sol, an ETH-backed redemption vault that gives that token a floor price which can only rise:- Mechanism. The vault holds an ETH reserve and a token inventory. It sells at the floor plus a premium and redeems at the floor minus a fee, where floor = reserve / backedSupply. Buys, sells and donations each leave the floor equal or higher, and nobody, including the owner, can withdraw ETH or pause redemptions.
- Token slot.
setTokenis owner-only, one-shot, rejects zero, emitsTokenSet, and every token feature reverts withTokenNotSetuntil it is set.token()returns zero until then. - Owner. Constructor takes one argument, the owner, filled by
$owner. The factory deployer keeps no rights. The constructor makes no external calls. - Configuration. Opening price and spreads are owner-set after launch with events and not-configured reverts, since prices and fee rates are the requester's. Spreads are capped by constants (20% premium, 10% fee).
Verification
Check Result forge build (solc 0.8.26, bytecode_hash none) passes forge test with the verifier's fuzz seed 56 passed, 0 failed forge fmt --check passes Scratch rehearsal of the protected floor (create2 deploy, runtime size, forbidden opcodes, owner) passes, 5.9 KB runtime Tests cover success and failure paths for every function, reentrancy from the ETH payout, a fee-on-transfer token, a rejecting ETH receiver, fuzzed monotone-floor and no-profit round-trip properties, and an invariant suite for floor, ETH and token conservation.
Why the previous attempt failed and how this avoids it. The prior build hit a duplicate
console.logdefinition from a mismatched forge-std copy. This tree vendors forge-std v1.9.7 and OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 as plain files underlib/with their nested libraries removed, and the whole thing was re-verified from a clean clone with no network.Documentation.
README.mdcovers the mechanism, trust assumptions, every owner power and its limits, named constants, the "After launch" steps for the owner, operational responsibilities and the security review performed. The ABI is atdocs/abi/RisingFloorVault.json. Nolaunch.jsonor deploy script was written, as the manifest step owns that.Open items for later stages. Slither and Mythril were not available here, so only Foundry's compiler, linter, fuzz and invariant tests ran. The independent adversarial review and explorer verification remain for the workflow's later steps.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 30 turns · 13m 20s · 930 in · 55.6K out · 2.4M cachedsubmission61c57bb2c569f7edf8821ff1c0753af8d34bd5d4b6166dd98c308984a91b0467devicedd2ee4882a1be950e89bc870c2886733619a93bc6d0d0f610b35774715a69940started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68fbundlee05e694f6c460f44862fe08e906ab9ef4b167ecf6c047279e27133d1ed16fc55 · 512 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·changed · 394 files.gitignoreREADME.mddocs/abi/RisingFloorVault.jsonfoundry.tomllib/forge-std/.gitattributeslib/forge-std/.gitignorelib/forge-std/LICENSE-APACHElib/forge-std/LICENSE-MITlib/forge-std/README.mdlib/forge-std/foundry.tomllib/forge-std/package.jsonlib/forge-std/src/Base.sollib/forge-std/src/Script.sollib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sollib/forge-std/src/StdChains.sollib/forge-std/src/StdCheats.sollib/forge-std/src/StdConstants.sollib/forge-std/src/StdError.sollib/forge-std/src/StdInvariant.sollib/forge-std/src/StdJson.sollib/forge-std/src/StdMath.sollib/forge-std/src/StdStorage.sollib/forge-std/src/StdStyle.sollib/forge-std/src/StdToml.sollib/forge-std/src/StdUtils.sollib/forge-std/src/Test.sollib/forge-std/src/Vm.sollib/forge-std/src/console.sollib/forge-std/src/console2.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IERC1155.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IERC165.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IERC20.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IERC4626.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IERC6909.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IERC721.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IERC7540.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IERC7575.sollib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sollib/forge-std/src/safeconsole.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/.changeset/config.jsonlib/openzeppelin-contracts/.codecov.ymllib/openzeppelin-contracts/.editorconfiglib/openzeppelin-contracts/.gitignorelib/openzeppelin-contracts/.gitmoduleslib/openzeppelin-contracts/.husky/pre-commitlib/openzeppelin-contracts/.mocharc.jslib/openzeppelin-contracts/.prettierrclib/openzeppelin-contracts/.solcover.jslib/openzeppelin-contracts/CHANGELOG.mdlib/openzeppelin-contracts/LICENSElib/openzeppelin-contracts/README.mdlib/openzeppelin-contracts/SECURITY.mdlib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/AccessControl.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/IAccessControl.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/Ownable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/Ownable2Step.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/extensions/AccessControlDefaultAdminRules.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/extensions/AccessControlEnumerable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/extensions/IAccessControlDefaultAdminRules.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/extensions/IAccessControlEnumerable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/manager/AccessManaged.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/manager/AccessManager.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/manager/AuthorityUtils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/manager/IAccessManaged.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/manager/IAccessManager.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/access/manager/IAuthority.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/account/Account.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/account/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/account/extensions/draft-AccountERC7579.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/account/extensions/draft-AccountERC7579Hooked.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/account/extensions/draft-ERC7821.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/account/utils/EIP7702Utils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/account/utils/draft-ERC4337Utils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/account/utils/draft-ERC7579Utils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/finance/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/finance/VestingWallet.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/finance/VestingWalletCliff.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/Governor.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/IGovernor.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/TimelockController.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorCountingFractional.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorCountingOverridable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorCountingSimple.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorNoncesKeyed.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorPreventLateQuorum.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorProposalGuardian.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorSequentialProposalId.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorSettings.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorStorage.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorSuperQuorum.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorTimelockAccess.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorTimelockCompound.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorTimelockControl.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorVotes.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorVotesQuorumFraction.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorVotesSuperQuorumFraction.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/utils/IVotes.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/utils/Votes.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/governance/utils/VotesExtended.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1155.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1155MetadataURI.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1155Receiver.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1271.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1363.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1363Receiver.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1363Spender.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC165.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1820Implementer.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1820Registry.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC1967.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC20.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC20Metadata.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC2309.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC2612.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC2981.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC3156.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC3156FlashBorrower.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC3156FlashLender.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC4626.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC4906.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC5267.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC5313.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC5805.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC6372.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC721.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC721Enumerable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC721Metadata.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC721Receiver.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC777.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC777Recipient.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC777Sender.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/IERC7913.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC1822.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC4337.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC6093.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC6909.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC7579.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC7674.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC7802.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC7821.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/metatx/ERC2771Context.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/metatx/ERC2771Forwarder.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/metatx/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/AccessManagedTarget.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/AccessManagerMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ArraysMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/AuthorityMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/Base64Dirty.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/BatchCaller.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/CallReceiverMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ConstructorMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ContextMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/DummyImplementation.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/EIP712Verifier.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ERC1271WalletMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ERC165/ERC165InterfacesSupported.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ERC165/ERC165MaliciousData.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ERC165/ERC165MissingData.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ERC165/ERC165NotSupported.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ERC165/ERC165ReturnBomb.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ERC2771ContextMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ERC3156FlashBorrowerMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/EtherReceiverMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/InitializableMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/MerkleProofCustomHashMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/MerkleTreeMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/MulticallHelper.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/MultipleInheritanceInitializableMocks.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/PausableMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ReentrancyAttack.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ReentrancyMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/ReentrancyTransientMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/RegressionImplementation.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/SingleInheritanceInitializableMocks.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/Stateless.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/StorageSlotMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/TimelockReentrant.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/TransientSlotMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/UpgradeableBeaconMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/VotesExtendedMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/VotesMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/account/AccountMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/account/modules/ERC7579Mock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/account/utils/ERC7579UtilsMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/compound/CompTimelock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/ERC20WithAutoMinerReward.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/ERC4626Fees.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/MyNFT.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/access-control/AccessControlERC20MintBase.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/access-control/AccessControlERC20MintMissing.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/access-control/AccessControlERC20MintOnlyRole.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/access-control/AccessControlModified.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/access-control/AccessManagedERC20MintBase.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/access-control/MyContractOwnable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/account/MyAccountERC7702.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/account/MyFactoryAccount.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/governance/MyGovernor.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/governance/MyToken.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/governance/MyTokenTimestampBased.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/governance/MyTokenWrapped.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/token/ERC1155/GameItems.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/token/ERC1155/MyERC115HolderContract.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/token/ERC20/GLDToken.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/token/ERC6909/ERC6909GameItems.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/token/ERC721/GameItem.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/utilities/Base64NFT.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/docs/utilities/Multicall.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorCountingOverridableMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorFractionalMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorNoncesKeyedMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorPreventLateQuorumMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorProposalGuardianMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorSequentialProposalIdMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorStorageMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorSuperQuorumMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorTimelockAccessMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorTimelockCompoundMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorTimelockControlMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorVoteMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorVotesSuperQuorumFractionMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/governance/GovernorWithParamsMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/proxy/BadBeacon.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/proxy/ClashingImplementation.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/proxy/UUPSUpgradeableMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC1155ReceiverMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC1363ForceApproveMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC1363NoReturnMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC1363ReceiverMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC1363ReturnFalseMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC1363SpenderMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20ApprovalMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20BridgeableMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20DecimalsMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20ExcessDecimalsMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20FlashMintMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20ForceApproveMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20GetterHelper.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20Mock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20MulticallMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20NoReturnMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20Reentrant.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20ReturnFalseMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20VotesAdditionalCheckpointsMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20VotesLegacyMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC20VotesTimestampMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC4626LimitsMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC4626Mock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC4626OffsetMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC4646FeesMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC721ConsecutiveEnumerableMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC721ConsecutiveMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC721ReceiverMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/token/ERC721URIStorageMock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/mocks/utils/cryptography/ERC7739Mock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/package.jsonlib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/Clones.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/ERC1967/ERC1967Proxy.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/ERC1967/ERC1967Utils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/Proxy.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/beacon/BeaconProxy.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/beacon/IBeacon.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/beacon/UpgradeableBeacon.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/transparent/ProxyAdmin.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/transparent/TransparentUpgradeableProxy.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/utils/Initializable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/proxy/utils/UUPSUpgradeable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/ERC1155.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/IERC1155.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/IERC1155Receiver.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/extensions/ERC1155Burnable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/extensions/ERC1155Pausable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/extensions/ERC1155Supply.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/extensions/ERC1155URIStorage.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/extensions/IERC1155MetadataURI.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/utils/ERC1155Holder.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC1155/utils/ERC1155Utils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC1363.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Burnable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Capped.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20FlashMint.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Pausable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Permit.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Votes.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Wrapper.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC4626.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Permit.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/draft-ERC20Bridgeable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/draft-ERC20TemporaryApproval.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/ERC1363Utils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC6909/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC6909/draft-ERC6909.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC6909/extensions/draft-ERC6909ContentURI.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC6909/extensions/draft-ERC6909Metadata.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC6909/extensions/draft-ERC6909TokenSupply.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/ERC721.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/IERC721.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/IERC721Receiver.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Burnable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Consecutive.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Enumerable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Pausable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Royalty.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721URIStorage.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Votes.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Wrapper.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/IERC721Enumerable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/IERC721Metadata.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/utils/ERC721Holder.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC721/utils/ERC721Utils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/common/ERC2981.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/common/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Address.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Arrays.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Base64.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Blockhash.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Bytes.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/CAIP10.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/CAIP2.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Calldata.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Comparators.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Context.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Create2.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Errors.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Multicall.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Nonces.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/NoncesKeyed.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Packing.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Panic.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Pausable.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/ReentrancyGuard.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/ReentrancyGuardTransient.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/ShortStrings.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/SlotDerivation.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/StorageSlot.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Strings.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/TransientSlot.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/ECDSA.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/EIP712.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/Hashes.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/MerkleProof.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/MessageHashUtils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/P256.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/README.adoclib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/RSA.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/SignatureChecker.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/draft-ERC7739Utils.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/AbstractSigner.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/MultiSignerERC7913.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/MultiSignerERC7913Weighted.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/SignerECDSA.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/SignerERC7702.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/SignerERC7913.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/SignerP256.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/SignerRSA.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/signers/draft-ERC7739.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/verifiers/ERC7913P256Verifier.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/cryptography/verifiers/ERC7913RSAVerifier.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/introspection/ERC165.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/introspection/ERC165Checker.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/introspection/IERC165.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/math/Math.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/math/SafeCast.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/math/SignedMath.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/structs/BitMaps.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/structs/Checkpoints.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/structs/CircularBuffer.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/structs/DoubleEndedQueue.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/structs/EnumerableMap.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/structs/EnumerableSet.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/structs/Heap.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/structs/MerkleTree.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/types/Time.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/vendor/compound/ICompoundTimelock.sollib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/vendor/compound/LICENSElib/openzeppelin-contracts/package.jsonremappings.txtsrc/RisingFloorVault.soltest/RisingFloorVault.invariant.t.soltest/RisingFloorVault.t.soltest/mocks/Actors.soltest/mocks/MockERC20.solManifestAgent #2041 file changedsent back
Created
launch.jsonforRisingFloorVaultwithconstructorArgs: ["$owner"].Manifest structure and constructor ABI checks passed.
forge buildsucceeded; all 56 tests passed with the supplied fuzz seed. Build reported an existing ETH-transfer lint warning.Only
launch.jsonchanged.ran oncodex · gpt-6.1-sol · 3 turns · 39s · 18.9K in · 1.4K out · 103.7K cachedsubmission26ecd3e5a51b645d46569182c0fe7cc30a43eed7443928ba34bea48cd06af63fdevice4dd9389cdce7acfe1def41802f403a317a6fdae23a57a2ae38cb8697327fc3e2started fromd2acb2d645685f7f918efa0a96d2f19c908555c1bundle0bc06853b2016b66683a55c8d83d5dfcf0c63fee7f803bd5bcc4130571f99f16 · 513 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·applied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edchanged · 1 filelaunch.jsonmay writelaunch.jsonAudit flowAgent #11found 2 high, 1 low, 2 info
The review is complete. Findings are in
.imd-findings.json, all five snippets match the tree, and all 13 entry points have coverage rows. No repository files were changed; only the findings file and the throwawaytest/scratch/proofs were written.Two high findings, each with a Foundry proof that fails on the current code:
-
Idle reserve goes to the next buyer (
src/RisingFloorVault.sol:313). WhilebackedSupplyis zero, the ask isopeningPricealone and ignores ETH already in the vault. The README's step 5 tells the owner to seed the reserve by donation before the first sale. A buyer paying 1 wei then receives 1000 base units and redeems them for 9.9 ETH of the 10 ETH seed. The same mechanism lets the last redeemer, or the owner, capture fees retained after a full redemption. Proof:test/scratch/IdleReserveCapture.t.sol. -
Inventory is redeemable against the reserve (
src/RisingFloorVault.sol:166). Sold tokens and unsold inventory are the same ERC-20, andsellaccepts tokens from any holder up tobackedSupply. The owner can callwithdrawInventoryto an accomplice who then sells, taking 9.9 ETH that Alice paid and leaving Alice unable to redeem. Any outside holder of the Keel-launched token can do the same without the owner. This contradicts the README's claim that nobody can withdraw ETH and that inventory withdrawal is not a custody power. Proof:test/scratch/InventoryRedeemsReserve.t.sol.
Lower-severity notes: donated ETH is stranded forever if the owner renounces before
setToken(low). Spread changes take effect immediately and can front-run zero-slippage orders within the caps, a documented trust assumption (info). The README tells the manifest step to write$owner, while the manifest guidance says a brief-stated owner address is written statically (info).What held: ABI documentation matches the compiled ABI exactly. Vendored OpenZeppelin 5.4.0 bases are unmodified. Floor monotonicity, checks-effects-interactions, reentrancy guards, the one-time token slot, the opening-price ratchet, and the constructor's empty-chain safety all traced correctly. The existing 56 tests pass, but none seed ETH while supply is zero or redeem withdrawn inventory, which is why both high findings were missed.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 28 turns · 7m 26s · 386 in · 30.7K out · 924.3K cachedsubmission03d73467e785d8b813e416661844b0e5295389699a84368ae32e9907b42eac6edevicec2e167266d13dcf4799e5339055687439f82b9c239967df30587a4703733486fstarted fromd2acb2d645685f7f918efa0a96d2f19c908555c1bundlenoneapplied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edhighETH in the reserve while backedSupply == 0 is not priced into the ask: the next buyer captures it all for dustsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:313
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passhighUnsold inventory is fungible with sold tokens, so the owner (or any outside holder) can redeem the ETH reserve out from under the vault's buyerssrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:166
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passDonations accepted before setToken; renounceOwnership before setToken locks that ETH foreversrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:117
receive() accepts ETH in every state, including before the token slot is filled. The only way ETH leaves is sell(), which requires a token and backedSupply > 0. If the owner calls renounceOwnership() (inherited, README line 77 documents it as available) before setToken(), or loses the key, no token can ever be set and every wei donated is permanently locked.
Owner-triggered, so low; mitigation is to refuse ETH until isConfigured() or to make renounceOwnership() revert while token() is zero.
Deploy RisingFloorVault(owner).
Anyone sends 1 ether to the vault: accepted, ReserveDonated emitted, reserve() == 1 ether.
Owner calls renounceOwnership(); owner() == address(0). setToken(x) now reverts OwnableUnauthorizedAccount for every caller; buy/sell revert TokenNotSet forever.
Expected: ETH cannot be stranded by an admin action; actual: 1 ether is unrecoverable by anyone.
Owner can change spreads within caps between a user's quote and execution; users who pass zero slippage minimums pay up to 10% more fee or 20% more premiumsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:145
Documented trust assumption (README line 73), reported for the record with actor and preconditions. setSpreads has no timelock and takes effect immediately, so a pending sell(amount, 0) or buy(0) can be front-run by the owner to the cap. Funds stay in the reserve (benefiting remaining holders), so this is not custody; the slippage parameters defend against it when the website passes quoteBuy/quoteSell as minimums as README line 143-144 instructs.
Configured vault with sellFeeBps = 0.
Alice holds 1,000e18 backed tokens with floor 0.001 ETH, quoteSell = 1 ETH; she submits sell(1000e18, 0).
Owner's setSpreads(0, 1000) is mined first.
Alice receives 0.9 ETH instead of 1 ETH; with minEthOut = 1 ETH she would have reverted SlippageExceeded instead.
README tells the manifest step to write $owner although the brief states the owner address; the manifest guidance says a brief-stated owner is written as the static addressREADME.md:53
No launch.json exists yet (correct for this stage). The README's deployment table instructs the manifest to pass
$owner. The canonical manifest guidance states: 'An owner address the brief itself states is written as that static address instead of $owner.'The approved workflow names 0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69 explicitly, so the manifest assignment should write that static address in constructorArgs; if the paying wallet differs from the named owner,
$ownerwould hand control to the wrong party. Documentation-only; the constructor itself takes an explicit owner argument and the deployer keeps no rights, which is correct.Manifest written per README: constructorArgs ["$owner"].
If the launch payer wallet != 0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69, owner() after deployment is the payer, not the brief's owner.
Expected per guidance: constructorArgs ["0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69"].
-
Audit economicsAgent #1812found 2 high, 1 low, 1 info
The review is complete. The findings file is written, and no source, test, or configuration file was changed.
Result: two high-severity economic defects, one low, one informational. All 13 entry points have coverage rows, and the suite of 56 existing tests passes on the current code.
Finding 1 (high): ETH held while nothing is outstanding goes to the first buyer, at any size. When
backedSupplyis zero the opening buy is priced at the opening price alone and ignores ETH already in the vault. The README's post-launch step 5 tells the owner to seed the reserve by plain transfer, which is exactly this state. In the proof, the owner seeds 10 ETH, a buyer spends 1 wei, gets 1000 base units, and redeems them for 9.9 ETH. The same hole lets the last redeemer recover the fee left after a full redemption. Proof file fails on the current code and passes once the reserve is forced to zero whenever the supply is zero.Finding 2 (high): anyone can brick sales for about 0.0001 ETH. The opening-price ratchet writes reserve divided by supply when a redemption empties the supply. A 1 wei buy makes the supply 1000 base units, a 0.01 ETH donation then makes that ratio 1e31, and redeeming the dust locks it in. The owner can never set a sane opening price again, and 1 ETH buys 99 base units. Proof fails now with
OpeningPriceBelowFloorand passes once the ratchet stops using the donation-inflated ratio.Finding 3 (low): tokens bought outside the vault share the redemption cap, so outside holders can drain
backedSupplyand leave vault buyers with no redemption path. Documented in the README as first come, first served, so reported as a design assumption with a reproduction.Finding 4 (info):
bidPrice()reports a non-zero price while nothing is redeemable, andaskPrice()omits the premium on the opening sale, unlike the README formula.What held: floor monotonicity on buys and sells with supply outstanding, reserve coverage of all redemptions, absence of any owner path to the ETH reserve, spread caps, inventory moves not affecting the floor, and the two-step ownership flow. The slither strict-equality and aderyn reentrancy leads were traced and dismissed as not reachable. Both proofs were also run against a patched copy in scratch space to confirm they turn green under a fix.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 25 turns · 8m 30s · 386 in · 28.9K out · 1.1M cachedsubmission79da454114a90fecd90a7d140a9ac150c4b9a2e10aaa80000afde7e1aed49c4fdevice589ef002581a53719d3af2622bb0d2ba58ea5f4139529f8b933806d6cb2e511dstarted fromd2acb2d645685f7f918efa0a96d2f19c908555c1bundlenoneapplied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edhighETH held while backedSupply == 0 (owner seed donation or leftover redemption fee) is captured by the first buyer of any sizesrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:313
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passhighminOpeningPrice ratchet can be inflated to an unusable value by anyone for ~0.0001 ETH, permanently disabling salessrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:233
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passRedemption cap is shared with tokens that never passed through the vault: outside holders can exhaust backedSupply and leave vault buyers with no floorsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:222
sell() accepts any holder's tokens up to backedSupply. The project token is launched separately on Keel with its own supply, so holders who bought there (or the token deployer) can redeem the entire backed supply at the floor before the vault's own buyers do. After that backedSupply == 0 and every later sell by a vault buyer reverts with ExceedsBackedSupply, so the 'never drops' guarantee holds for the aggregate but not for any individual buyer.
The README documents this as first come, first served, so it is reported as a trust/design assumption that the website and brief should state plainly, not as a code bug. A per-buyer redemption credit (track tokens sold per address, transferable or not) would make the guarantee individual; that is a scope decision for the author.
bidPrice() and askPrice() diverge from the executing functions while backedSupply == 0src/RisingFloorVault.sol:290
With nothing outstanding floorPrice() returns openingPrice, so bidPrice() reports a non-zero redemption price although quoteSell() returns 0 and sell() reverts (ExceedsBackedSupply) for every amount. askPrice() in the same state returns openingPrice with no premium, while the README defines askPrice as floor * (1 + premium); quoteBuy and buy agree with askPrice (no premium on the opening sale), so only the documentation and the bid view are inconsistent.
The website shows these values; a user may believe tokens are redeemable at bidPrice when they are not. Suggest bidPrice() return 0 when backedSupply == 0 and the README state that the opening sale carries no premium.
setSpreads(300, 100); setOpeningPrice(1e15); no buys. bidPrice() == 1e15 * 9900 / 10000 = 9.9e14, quoteSell(1e18) == 0, sell(1e18, 0) reverts ExceedsBackedSupply(0, 1e18). askPrice() == 1e15 while README formula gives 1.03e15.
Audit mathAgent #926found 2 high, 2 low
The review is complete.
.imd-findings.jsonholds 4 findings and a 19-row coverage record covering all 13 entry points plus the invariants and the static-analysis leads. No repository file was changed; the only writes are the findings file andtest/scratch/, which the repo's own gitignore excludes.Findings
- High,
src/RisingFloorVault.sol:313, seeded reserve swept by the first buyer. The first buy whenbackedSupply == 0is priced at the opening price and ignores ETH already in the vault. The README tells the owner to seed the reserve by donation. With a 10 ETH seed and the suggested spreads, an attacker pays 0.001 ETH, gets one token backed by the whole reserve, and redeems it for 9.90099 ETH. Proof test attached; it fails now and passes on a patched copy that refuses donations while nothing is backed. - High,
src/RisingFloorVault.sol:231, dust remainder bricks the vault permanently. A sole holder sells all but 1 base unit, donates 10 ETH against that unit, and redeems it back at zero fee. The full-redemption ratchet writes the per-unit floor of 1e37 intominOpeningPrice. The owner can never lower the opening price again and 1 ETH buys 0 units. Net attacker cost is gas only. Proof test attached and verified the same way. - Low, line 319, chunked redemptions avoid the fee. A sole holder paying 1% in one sale pays 0.011% in two. Remaining holders get less uplift than the README implies; no loss.
- Low, line 127,
setTokenaccepts an address with no code. A wrong address bricks every token feature with no recovery because the slot is one-shot. Owner error, cheap guard.
Coverage. Buy, sell and receive are marked as findings. The remaining ten entry points hold. I traced the floor-monotonicity rounding, intermediate overflow bounds, quote-to-execution parity, the six slither strict-equality leads and the aderyn reentrancy lead, all of which hold. The existing 60 project tests still pass.
Not reached. I did not model a token with 18+ decimals beyond the 18-decimal case, and I did not quantify overflow for base-unit supplies above 1e73, which no realistic token reaches.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 30 turns · 10m 10s · 482 in · 44K out · 1.5M cachedsubmission923f15b4222a35e9e09218dbfd1541cddee954c8081473df52af40de3f682e35devicefa8fc4653a9e883d4b2a1e1c53a856ddf70e90f433ae70645a4a0bb3cccdd962started fromd2acb2d645685f7f918efa0a96d2f19c908555c1bundlenoneapplied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edhighFirst buy after backedSupply==0 is priced at openingPrice and ignores the reserve, so any seeded or leftover ETH is swept by the next buyersrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:313
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passhighA sole holder can leave 1 base unit outstanding, inflate the per-unit floor without bound, and the full-redemption ratchet then locks minOpeningPrice at an unusable value foreversrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:231
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passRedemption fee is largely avoidable by selling in chunks, so remaining holders receive less uplift than the per-sale fee impliessrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:319
Vault with setSpreads(300,100), openingPrice 1e15, 1_000_000e18 inventory.
A: buy{value:1 ether}(0) -> 1000e18.
Case 1: sell(1000e18,0) -> 990_000_000_000_000_000 wei.
Case 2 (fresh state): sell(999e18,0) -> 989_010_000_000_000_000; sell(1e18,0) -> 10_880_100_000_000_000; total 999_890_100_000_000_000 wei, leftover reserve 109_900_000_000_000 wei instead of 10_000_000_000_000_000.
Expected per README: 1% of the payout stays for remaining holders; actual: 0.011% stays.
setToken accepts an address without code; a wrong address permanently bricks every token feature because the slot is one-shotsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:127
The slot is irreversible by the brief, but the only validation is non-zero. If the owner passes an address with no code (typo, wrong chain's Keel address, or a not-yet-deployed address), every balanceOf call in buy, sell, depositInventory, inventory and withdrawInventory reverts on ABI decoding of empty return data, and setToken reverts TokenAlreadySet, so the vault can never be used and any ETH donated to it is stuck. This is owner error rather than an attack, so low.
A cheap guard that keeps the brief's semantics (owner-only, once, non-zero): require token_.code.length != 0, and optionally a staticcall to balanceOf(address(this)) that must succeed.
Boundary: external call to an address without code.
Fresh vault; owner: setToken(address(0x1234)); setSpreads(0,0); setOpeningPrice(1e15).
Anyone: buy{value:1 ether}(0) reverts (empty return data from balanceOf).
Owner: setToken(realToken) reverts TokenAlreadySet.
Expected: the slot refuses an address that is not a contract, or at least one whose balanceOf does not answer.
Actual: accepted, vault unusable forever.
Shown by test_setTokenNoCode in test/scratch/Numbers.t.sol (passes, i.e. both reverts observed).
- High,
Audit permissionsAgent #440found 2 high, 1 medium, 1 low, 1 info
Snippets all verify line-by-line. The findings file is complete and the scratch proofs reproduce each high finding. Done.
Outcome: the review found two high, one medium, one low and one info defect in
RisingFloorVault, all recorded with reproductions in.imd-findings.jsonalong with a coverage row for every one of the 13 entry points. No repository file was modified; the proofs live undertest/scratch/, which is gitignored.Findings, most severe first
- High: the first buy of a cycle sweeps the reserve. While nothing is outstanding the ask is just the opening price, so any ETH already in the vault (the owner's seed from README step 5, or fees left by the last redemption) becomes the floor of whoever buys next. A 1 ETH buy against a 10 ETH seed redeems for 10.89 ETH. Proof fails on the tree and passes on a patched copy.
- High: anyone can permanently brick sales for about 0.0001 ETH. The full-redemption ratchet copies the floor of the last dust tokens into the opening-price lower bound, which nothing can lower. Buy 1 ETH, buy 1 wei, redeem both, and the minimum opening price lands at 1.05e31. Proof fails on the tree and passes on a patched copy that ratchets to the highest price actually paid.
- Medium: the owner can take ETH out of the reserve by withdrawing unsold inventory and redeeming it, which the README says is impossible. Any outside token holder can do the same, leaving the vault's own buyer unable to redeem. Proof included; the fix needs a scope decision on per-buyer redemption credit.
- Low: the one-shot token slot accepts an address without code, bricking the vault and stranding donated ETH on an owner typo.
- Info: the README tells the manifest step to write
$owner, but the brief states the owner address, so the manifest should carry the static address.
Coverage. All 13 entry points have rows, plus five invariant rows. The ownership functions, pause, spreads, rescue, inventory deposit, reentrancy paths, constructor ownership and the ABI export (identical to the compiled ABI) hold. The existing 56 tests pass; the invariant suite misses findings 1 and 2 because its handler never redeems the full supply with dust remaining and never donates before the first sale.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 30 turns · 10m 16s · 482 in · 41.3K out · 1.6M cachedsubmission10224e07acbf8f66809ed95e5d687f60ed45d9d2eb4dbff8dfb562374b187fb5device6ef494db85781eec11af6ed42b4e455faba3a2395fa3fe3ca47b4b5fc8708369started fromd2acb2d645685f7f918efa0a96d2f19c908555c1bundlenoneapplied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edhighFirst buy while nothing is outstanding ignores the ETH already in the reserve: a dust buyer sweeps the owner's seed or leftover feessrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:313
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passhighFull-redemption ratchet copies a fee-concentrated floor into minOpeningPrice; anyone can push it to ~1e31 for ~0.0001 ETH and nothing can lower it, permanently disabling salessrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:233
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passmediumsell() redeems tokens the vault never sold: the owner (via withdrawInventory) or any outside holder can take the ETH that backs a vault buyer, contradicting 'nobody, including the owner, can withdraw src/RisingFloorVault.sol:221
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passsetToken accepts an address without code; the one-shot slot then permanently disables every token feature and strands any donated ETHsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:127
Manifest guidance: the brief names the owner address, so constructorArgs should carry that static address rather than $ownerREADME.md:53
State: launch paid by wallet P != 0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69 and no owner field in the request.
Manifest written per README line 53: constructorArgs ["$owner"].
Deployment resolves $owner = P; RisingFloorVault.owner() == P.
Expected per workflow.md line 5: owner() == 0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69.
Writing the static address makes the result independent of who paid.
Write foundry testsAgent #15522 files changedsent back
Done. The test deliverable is complete and verified, and one defect is reported rather than tested around.
What I added (both under
test/, formatted with forge fmt):RisingFloorVault.edges.t.sol: 41 tests on inputs the existing suite skipped. Deployment through a factory stand-in in one call, with the factory proven to hold no rights. Unknown calldata and valued calls to missing selectors revert. Pending owner has no rights, strangers cannot transfer or renounce, renouncing before the token slot is filled freezes the vault forever. ERC-20 side failures on sell (no approval, no balance) leave state untouched. Fungibility of transferred tokens, first-come-first-served over-redemption by outside holders, the exact backed-supply boundary, dust buys and sells with supply outstanding, buying the entire inventory, the owner draining inventory never blocking redemptions, rescue of a codeless address or more than held, forced ETH. Fuzz properties at 1000 runs: quotes equal actual outputs in irregular states, zero-spread round trips lose only rounding, max-spread round trips lose at least the closed-form spread, the floor never falls for any opening price up to 1e30, the opening ratchet after full redemption, and partial redemptions never empty the reserve.RisingFloorVault.sequences.invariant.t.sol: a second handler with four actors, owner actions (spreads, opening price, pauses, inventory withdrawals), holder-to-holder transfers, forced ETH, asellAllpath that reaches full redemptions, and revert probes. It runs with fail-on-revert enabled, so every call is either checked against its quote and prior floor or asserts its exact revert. Six invariants: floor never below its high-water mark and reopen minimum, ETH conservation with the owner never receiving ETH, token conservation against ghost totals, solvency for every holder at the bid, price ordering within caps, and sticky configuration.
Results with the verifier seed: 98 tests pass across four suites, including 8192 handler calls with zero unpredicted reverts. Three unseeded invariant runs and two unseeded fuzz runs also pass.
Finding reported in
.imd-findings.json(high, with a proof that fails on the current code): any ETH in the reserve while nothing is outstanding is captured in full by the first buyer. A seed donation of 10 ETH, which the README recommends as step 5, is taken by whoever buys one token for 0.001 ETH and redeems it. The same happens to the fee residue left after every full redemption, so the final seller also avoids the redemption fee by buying one token back. The floor-never-falls guarantee still holds, which is why no existing test caught it. Two lesser findings without proof:setTokenaccepts an address with no code, which permanently bricks the one-shot slot, and the first buy of each epoch carries no premium, which the website should not assume otherwise.Nothing was installed, no configuration files were touched, and the new files are uncommitted in the working tree as the harness rules require.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 59 turns · 15m 36s · 706 in · 69.4K out · 2.4M cachedsubmission7b0826369451031ad293dd42544bbbff9ec62ec9b8211a4772bf2613eaee8509devicefaf271d05ee8ea0f065518eb6a8b8512bd30b2a691daebee8c5205fb7c3ca911started fromd2acb2d645685f7f918efa0a96d2f19c908555c1bundled46f17684d0ec7f7ebfc7fe7329f9bc3ca7238a9309f08d49ff7ba16efb090e8 · 522 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·applied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edchanged · 2 filestest/RisingFloorVault.edges.t.soltest/RisingFloorVault.sequences.invariant.t.solmay writetesttest/**highETH held while backedSupply == 0 (seed donation or fee residue) is captured in full by the first buyer with a dust purchasesrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:313
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passsetToken accepts an address with no code; a typo permanently bricks the vault and strands any ETH already donatedsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:126
setTokenonly rejects the zero address. The slot is one-shot by design, so if the owner passes an address that is not a contract (or a wrong contract),buy,sell,depositInventoryandwithdrawInventoryrevert forever onbalanceOf/transfer, and any ETH that was sent to the vault before (donations are accepted at any time viareceive) can never be redeemed becausesellrequires the token. The README only says 'verify the address before sending'.A
token_.code.length == 0check (the token is deployed on Keel before this call, so it has code at that point; the launch-time constraint about empty chains applies to constructors, not to post-deployment owner calls) costs nothing and removes an irreversible operator mistake. Not asserted in the test suite because the current behaviour (an EOA is accepted) is not something the tests should bless.Owner calls setToken(0x000000000000000000000000000000000000ABCD) (an address with no code).
Expected: revert, slot stays empty for a correct retry.
Actual: TokenSet is emitted, token() returns that address, and every subsequent buy/sell/depositInventory/withdrawInventory reverts (SafeERC20/IERC20 call to an address without code); a second setToken reverts with TokenAlreadySet.
Any ETH donated earlier is stuck forever.
First buy of each epoch pays no premium and the opening ratchet makes the reserve residue the first buyer's problem to noticesrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:313
When
backedSupply == 0,askPrice()and_tokensOutuseopeningPricewith no premium applied, unlike every later buy. This is consistent and documented by the views, but the website should not assumeaskPrice() == floorPrice() * (1 + premium)in that state. Related to the high finding: once that is fixed, consider whether the first buy of an epoch should also carry the premium so the owner's configured spread applies uniformly.Configure spreads (500, 100) and openingPrice 0.001 ETH with no supply outstanding. askPrice() returns 0.001 ETH (== floorPrice()), not 0.00105 ETH; quoteBuy(1 ether) returns 1000e18. After the first buy, askPrice() returns floorPrice * 1.05.
Audit judgeAgent #1559found 2 high, 2 medium, 3 low, 2 info
Review complete. The findings file
.imd-findings.jsonholds 9 findings and 17 coverage rows (all 13 entry points answered, plus 4 invariant/manifest rows). The project's own 98 tests pass on this tree; every finding below was reproduced with a Foundry test undertest/scratch/, and the three proofs attached fail on the current code for the stated reason.Kept and merged findings
- High. Idle reserve at zero supply is swept by the next buyer. Five specialists reported this; merged into one. With no backed tokens, a buy is priced at the opening price alone, so a 1 wei buyer after a 10 ETH seed donation redeems 9.9 ETH. The same path lets the last redeemer reclaim the fee that is supposed to stay for holders. Proof attached, fails with a 10.9 ETH versus 1 ETH balance.
- High. Full-redemption ratchet is griefable to an unusable price. Three reports merged. A 1 wei buy, a 0.01 ETH donation and a redemption write about 1e31 into
minOpeningPrice, which has no path down. The owner can never reopen sales at a sane price. Proof attached, fails withOpeningPriceBelowFloor. - Medium. Redemption is not limited to vault-sold tokens. Three reports merged (specialists rated it high, medium and low). The owner withdraws inventory and redeems it for 9.9 ETH of a buyer's payment, contradicting the "no owner withdrawal" guarantee in natspec and README. Any outside holder can do the same. Proof attached.
- Medium. The manifest passes
$ownerwhere the brief names a static owner. The specialists flagged this against the README.launch.jsonnow exists and carries the same$owner, so I raised it as a manifest finding. Schema, argument count, name and ABI export are otherwise correct. - Low.
setTokenaccepts a codeless address into the one-shot slot. Three reports merged. - Low. Donations before
setTokenplusrenounceOwnershipstrand ETH forever. - Low. Chunked selling reduces the effective redemption fee from 1% to about 0.011%.
- Info.
bidPriceis non-zero andaskPriceomits the premium while supply is zero. Two reports merged. - Info. Owner spread changes between quote and execution, recorded as the documented trust assumption.
Dropped or downgraded. Nothing was dropped outright. The static-analysis leads did not add findings: the strict-equality warnings are intentional zero-supply branches, and the aderyn reentrancy line is covered by
nonReentrantwith state finalised before the ETH call.My own pass found no further defects. Runtime bytecode is about 5.9 KB, the constructor makes no external calls, and arithmetic uses
mulDivwith no overflow path. The owner-drain proof is my own; the other two attached proofs are the specialists' files, verified self-contained and failing here.ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 16 turns · 5m 35s · 322 in · 22.5K out · 823.3K cachedsubmission6bbff7836d8fb16a84bda35129600e85e5af7fbecbb13247bd3d467dfe201de5device2b170a76e3d9adca5bc821cd1416f3dbdd76151670e9a7bc21f5407d70659eb6started from6ca66ec7bcd9fc72f8ba073e67274de5087ea2aebundlenoneapplied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8ed, 675701250ac528deb94d52baad28f0b09c8d8ff160a0f3e0bbb9dda51580fd73, 01d3b5c42ce5d09635567c54f1a41fb58fdf6add8e03893880f9707b88ffb909highETH held while backedSupply == 0 (owner seed donation or fee residue after a full redemption) is captured by the next buyer of any sizesrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:313
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passhighFull-redemption ratchet copies a donation- or fee-concentrated floor into minOpeningPrice; anyone can push it to ~1e31 for ~0.0001 ETH and permanently disable salessrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:233
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passmediumsell() redeems tokens the vault never sold: the owner (via withdrawInventory) or any outside holder can take the reserve ETH that backs a vault buyer, contradicting the documented "no owner withdrawalsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:221
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passmediumlaunch.json passes $owner although the brief states the owner address; the manifest guidance requires the static address, otherwise ownership can land on the paying walletlaunch.json:6
setToken accepts an address with no code; because the slot is one-shot a wrong address permanently disables every token feature and strands any donated ETHsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:127
Reported by tests, math and permissions; merged. The brief makes the slot irreversible, but the only validation is non-zero and not-already-set.
An address without code (typo, the token's address on another chain, an address copied before Keel deployed it) is accepted and TokenSet is emitted; afterwards every balanceOf call in buy, sell, depositInventory, inventory and withdrawInventory reverts (empty return data decoding), isConfigured() returns true, and setToken reverts TokenAlreadySet. ETH donated earlier through receive() can then never leave, since sell is the only ETH exit.
Owner error rather than an exploit, hence low.
Fix: require token_.code.length != 0 in setToken (and optionally that IERC20(token_).balanceOf(address(this)) succeeds). setToken is a post-deployment owner call, so this does not conflict with the empty-chain constructor rule.
receive() accepts donations before setToken; renounceOwnership (or key loss) before setToken locks that ETH foreversrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:117
Reported by flow. receive() accepts ETH in every state, including before the token slot is filled. ETH leaves only through sell(), which requires a token and backedSupply > 0. If the owner calls the inherited renounceOwnership() (README line 77 lists it as available) before setToken(), or loses the key, no token can ever be set and every donated wei is permanently locked.
Owner-triggered, so low.
Mitigation: refuse ETH until isConfigured(), or make renounceOwnership() revert while token() is zero. Overlaps with finding 1 (donations at zero supply) in the sense that both are fixed by refusing ETH while backedSupply == 0.
Deploy RisingFloorVault(OWNER).
Anyone sends 1 ether: accepted, ReserveDonated emitted, reserve() == 1e18.
OWNER calls renounceOwnership(): owner() == address(0). setToken(x) now reverts OwnableUnauthorizedAccount for every caller; buy/sell revert TokenNotSet forever.
Expected: an admin action cannot strand user ETH.
Actual: 1 ether unrecoverable by anyone.
Verified in test/scratch/Checks.t.sol test_donationThenRenounce (passes: reserve 1 ether, owner zero, setToken reverts).
Redemption fee is largely avoidable by selling in chunks, so remaining holders receive far less uplift than the per-sale fee impliessrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:319
Reported by math. The fee is not removed from the pool; it stays in the reserve and is shared by whoever still holds backed tokens, including the seller for the part not yet sold. Selling in n pieces therefore pays strictly less total fee than one sale; for a sole holder the effective fee is roughly fee squared.
The floor still never falls, so this weakens README line 28-29 ('a non-zero fee stays in the reserve for the remaining holders') rather than causing a loss.
Options: document it, or charge the fee on a basis that is not redistributed to the seller; the latter changes the economics and needs an owner decision.
bidPrice() reports a non-zero redemption price while backedSupply == 0 although sell() reverts for every amount; askPrice() omits the premium in that state, unlike the README formulasrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:290
Reported by economics and tests; merged. With nothing outstanding floorPrice() returns openingPrice, so bidPrice() returns openingPrice*(BPS-fee)/BPS although quoteSell() returns 0 and sell() reverts ExceedsBackedSupply for every amount. askPrice() returns openingPrice with no premium while README line 22 defines askPrice as floor*(1+premium); quoteBuy and buy agree with askPrice, so only the documentation and the bid view are inconsistent.
The website shows these values; a user may believe tokens are redeemable at bidPrice when they are not. Suggest bidPrice() return 0 when backedSupply == 0 and the README state that the opening sale carries no premium.
setSpreads(300,100); setOpeningPrice(1e15); no buys. bidPrice() == 990000000000000, askPrice() == 1000000000000000 (README formula gives 1030000000000000), quoteSell(1e18) == 0, sell(1e18,0) reverts ExceedsBackedSupply(0, 1e18). Verified in test/scratch/Checks.t.sol test_viewsAtZeroSupply.
Owner can change spreads within the caps between a quote and its execution; users who pass zero slippage minimums can pay up to 10% more fee or 20% more premium (documented trust assumption)src/RisingFloorVault.sol:145
Reported by flow. README line 73 documents that spreads may change at any time within the caps; recorded here as a trust assumption with actor and preconditions, not a defect. setSpreads has no timelock, so a pending sell(amount, 0) or buy(0) can be front-run by the owner to the cap. Funds stay in the reserve for remaining holders, so this is not custody.
The slippage parameters defend against it when the website passes quoteBuy/quoteSell as minimums as README line 143-144 instructs.
Configured vault with sellFeeBps = 0.
ALICE holds 1000e18 backed tokens with floor 1e15; quoteSell(1000e18) == 1 ether.
ALICE submits sell(1000e18, 0); OWNER's setSpreads(0, 1000) is mined first.
ALICE receives 900000000000000000 wei instead of 1 ether; with minEthOut = 1 ether she would have reverted SlippageExceeded.
Verified in test/scratch/Checks.t.sol test_spreadFrontRun (logs 'out after frontrun 900000000000000000').
Build contract projectAgent #18715 files changedsent back
The responses file is excluded from git by the harness's own exclude list, which is its collection mechanism, so it sits at the repository root as required. All checks are green and nothing else is outstanding.
Recap
All three reopened findings reproduced on the starting tree and are fixed. The three held proofs now pass, along with the full suite.
Check Result forge buildpasses forge testwith the verifier's fuzz seed74 passed, 0 failed forge testwith a second seed74 passed, 0 failed forge fmt --checkclean Reviewer proofs (copied to scratch) 3 of 3 pass What changed in
src/RisingFloorVault.sol- Reserve capture at zero supply. Plain ETH is refused while nothing is outstanding, and the redemption that empties the backed supply pays the whole reserve fee-free. The reserve is therefore empty whenever the supply is, so no buyer ever inherits ETH priced into nobody's tokens.
- Ratchet griefing. I evaluated the suggested "highest price paid" ratchet and found it equally movable: with any non-zero fee, a sole holder can concentrate residue on one base unit, buy one unit at that ask, and redeem everything for the cost of the fee. So the activity-derived ratchet is gone. The minimum opening price now records only the owner-set opening price at which an epoch's first sale happened, which nobody but the owner can influence. A full redemption no longer rewrites the opening price.
- Redeeming unsold inventory. Each buy credits the buyer with a per-account redemption right that
sellspends. Withdrawn inventory, outside-minted and market-bought tokens have no credit, so the owner's two-step drain is closed and every vault buyer keeps their own redemption. A credit transfer function lets holders pass the right on with their tokens. The caller-side quote now returns zero without credit, and an explicit per-account quote was added. - Advisory items. The token setter rejects codeless addresses, renouncing ownership is refused until the token slot is filled, the bid price reads zero while nothing is redeemable, and the chunked-fee behaviour and the spread front-run scenario are documented rather than changed.
Tests and docs. The unit file gained tests for every item above, including both griefing sequences and a fuzz test that an empty supply always means an empty reserve. The invariant handler now bounds sells by credit, moves credits, expects donation refusals at zero supply, and has the owner attempt to redeem every withdrawal. Because
fail_on_revertis off, handler checks are recorded as violations and asserted from an invariant, which I verified actually fails when a violation occurs. The README's guarantees, epoch semantics, owner table, after-launch steps and website guidance were rewritten to match, and the ABI export was regenerated.Design trade-off to be aware of. An epoch's final floor is no longer carried into the next epoch. Every holder it protected has already been paid at it, and the owner can raise the opening price before the next sale. The README states this under "Epochs".
All eight findings are answered in the responses file with verdict "fixed" and the reproduction and tests behind each. No
launch.jsonor blocked file was written, and nothing was committed.ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 69 turns · 18m 30s · 546 in · 82.7K out · 2.3M cachedsubmissionddc6ea0c84f71ea9c0de7c752807b1aea029ce3fb4d0523222dfd1f44375dcb0device2a9662a76cb5f51d178c6d5ff9e9a5da33ad63feb5a9ef85547ee127dbf9fd6fstarted fromd2acb2d645685f7f918efa0a96d2f19c908555c1bundleece60206d50216d5343abaf615fb410d08017de4b7d80003da2f3dc7f448f1f4 · 522 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·changed · 5 filesREADME.mddocs/abi/RisingFloorVault.jsonsrc/RisingFloorVault.soltest/RisingFloorVault.invariant.t.soltest/RisingFloorVault.t.solManifestAgent #11731 file changedsent back
The finding reproduced and is fixed.
What I found. The approved brief in workflow.md states the owner explicitly as the creator wallet. The manifest guidance says a brief-stated owner is written as that static address rather than $owner. The previous launch.json used $owner, so ownership would follow the paying wallet if it differed from the brief's wallet.
What I changed. Only launch.json:
- The single constructor argument for RisingFloorVault is now the static address from the brief. This matches the one-parameter constructor in src/RisingFloorVault.sol.
- The notes now explain that the static address is used so ownership does not depend on who paid.
Checks. The manifest has only the kind, contracts and notes keys, with notes under the length limit. Both forge build and forge test with the verifier's fuzz seed pass, with 70 tests passing and none failing. Git status shows launch.json as the only modified tracked file.
Response file. The answer to the finding is recorded in .imd-responses.json at the repository root with verdict fixed. The file exists on disk but is gitignored in this workspace, so it will not appear in the commit diff. That is the location the task specified, so it is left as is.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 9 turns · 53s · 162 in · 3.1K out · 184.7K cachedsubmissionf9acebd06afc09f6fb3fe05e53d495b9839a732fe997bc9ed6dd258643f02c93device5c1e4764d4e20ef59396a25901f46bc91bd6bc928f7285902a1b85ca759b1272started fromc61b145bf4e364f4fb1f62ac5fb03a4877cbea9bbundle832477c4a6dfe1f7c6bbbeed11d6e9ee43dff022b854698a452a65b948ce9a1a · 523 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·applied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edchanged · 1 filelaunch.jsonmay writelaunch.jsonWrite foundry testsAgent #2052 files changedsent back
The findings file is excluded from git by the harness's own
.git/info/exclude, so that is expected: the harness collects it from the root. Everything is in place.Outcome: the suite passes against the revised source, and one defect is reported rather than tested around.
The source was changed after my previous round (redemption credits, refused donations between epochs, the last redemption paying the whole reserve, renamed errors), which left both of my files failing to compile. I revised them to the new semantics without rewriting them, and added coverage for the new surface.
Changes in
test/RisingFloorVault.edges.t.sol- Updated the renamed errors and the quote calls that now depend on the caller's credit.
- Split the old "transferred tokens redeem" test into three: tokens without credit fail at the credit gate, credit without tokens fails at the pull and leaves the credit intact, and both together redeem the whole reserve.
- Added
transferRedeemablefailure paths: zero address, zero amount, one over the credit, a stranger and the owner with no credit, a self-transfer that must not burn or double credit, a three-way split that sums to the reserve, and a reentrancy probe through the sell payout into the unguarded transfer. - Reworked the epoch-end tests to the new rule: the last holder takes the residue, the vault reopens at the opening price, and the ratchet is the opening sold at, not the floor reached.
- Added refused donations between epochs, renounce refused before the token is set, and forced ETH while empty going to the next epoch's holders.
Changes in
test/RisingFloorVault.sequences.invariant.t.sol- The handler now predicts every revert in the credit model, including credit-without-tokens pulls, and drives credit transfers and the owner's attempt to redeem withdrawn inventory.
- Donations are asserted refused exactly while nothing is outstanding. Forced ETH between epochs is tracked as a ghost so "empty vault, empty reserve" still holds.
- Invariants were made per-epoch for the floor and now also check that credits sum to the backed supply, that the ratchet equals the best opening ever sold at, and solvency per credit holder.
Results with the verifier's fuzz seed and a second seed:
Suite Tests Result All four suites 123 pass Sequence invariant 128 runs, depth 64, fail-on-revert 0 reverts Reported in
.imd-findings.json- Medium: a holder who redeems all but one base unit of credit concentrates the fee and rounding residue on that unit, pinning the ask at about 1e16 ETH per token. Sales effectively stop and the owner has no remedy, since the opening price cannot be changed while anything is outstanding. The proof in the findings file fails on the current code with the exact numbers.
- Info: between epochs the quoted floor returns to the opening price, below the floor the closed epoch reached. The source documents this as intended, so it is noted for the reviewer only.
Only the two test files changed in the tree. No configuration or source was touched.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 48 turns · 11m 48s · 322 in · 56.3K out · 1.1M cachedsubmissiond322a0b046ed2550b077c50212620340e0a556c2b89c179a54ed8172c54e19ecdevice357c46e3781993d449f398d7eae2be8718b1cfa8deff2cc3661e944506942b5estarted from5e26ec272028c9decd999a7383e737e20bbab2a4bundlefdc5f6b4c48205146e069afdcc6ad1b9120307a370eaa0796dca8f32d8e6fc26 · 544 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·applied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edchanged · 2 filestest/RisingFloorVault.edges.t.soltest/RisingFloorVault.sequences.invariant.t.solmay writetesttest/**mediumA holder keeping one base unit of credit pins the floor orders of magnitude higher and stalls sales; the owner has no remedysrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:371
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passBetween epochs the quoted floor falls back to the opening price, below the floor the closed epoch reachedsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:316
minOpeningPrice records only the opening price an epoch sold at, not the floor it reached, and the last redemption pays the whole reserve. So after a full redemption floorPrice() drops from the epoch's final floor to openingPrice, and the owner may legitimately reopen anywhere at or above the old opening.
Nobody holds a backed token at that moment, so no holder is underpaid, and the source documents this as intended (it replaced a ratchet that could be locked by donations against dust).
It is reported only because the brief's wording ('never drops in price') and the website will show a price that visibly goes down between epochs; the tests assert the documented behaviour (test_sell_lastRedeemerTakesTheResidueAndTheEpochReopensAtTheOpeningPrice, testFuzz_openingRatchetAfterFullRedemption).
setSpreads(500,100), setOpeningPrice(0.001 ether).
Alice buy 1 ETH, Bob buy 1 ETH, Alice sell all -> floorPrice ~ 0.00104 ETH.
Bob sell all -> floorPrice() == 0.001 ether, minOpeningPrice() == 0.001 ether.
Expected per the brief's wording: the displayed price never goes down; actual: it returns to the opening price.
Audit judgeAgent #785found 1 high, 2 info
Review complete. The findings file is at
.imd-findings.jsonwith 3 findings and 16 coverage rows; no repository file was changed.Settled from last round
- Reserve capture at zero supply (high): fixed.
receive()now reverts while nothing is outstanding and the final redemption pays the whole reserve fee-free. My proof and both specialist proofs on this root cause pass on this tree. - Ratchet brick (high): fixed.
minOpeningPriceis now written only from the owner-set opening price insidebuy(). Both ratchet proofs pass. - Owner or outside holder redeems the reserve (medium): fixed by the per-account
redeemablecredit. My proof passes. The flow specialist's proof now fails only because the owner's sell reverts, which is the fix working. - launch.json
$owner(medium): fixed. The manifest carries the brief's static owner address, matches the single constructor parameter, has only the schema keys, and the ABI export is identical to the compiled one. - Low and info items (codeless
setToken, pre-setToken donation stranding, chunked fee, bid price at zero supply, spread front-run): all confirmed fixed in code or documented as the author described.
The project's own suite passes with 123 tests.
New finding, carried from the tester (rated high, 1 of 3)
A sole credit holder who redeems all but one base unit leaves the whole fee residue behind that unit. The ask becomes astronomical,
setOpeningPricereverts withSupplyOutstanding, and the owner has no remedy. The position costs the griefer nothing since the last unit redeems the residue fee-free. Reproduced at launch with a 1000 wei buy: 1 ETH then buys 0.0866 of a token instead of 1000. The proof attest/scratch/Proof_DustPin.t.solfails on this tree and is attached. I rated it high rather than the tester's medium because it is unprivileged, costs gas only, and leaves the deployment unusable at the attacker's discretion.Two info notes: the floor visibly drops back to the opening price between epochs (documented design), and the README still says the manifest passes
$ownerand that no launch.json exists.Coverage answers all 14 entry points: 13 hold,
sellcarries finding 1. Static-analysis leads (strict equalities, reentrancy inbuy) were checked and are intentional or guarded, so none were kept.ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 16 turns · 5m 3s · 322 in · 19.8K out · 980.5K cachedsubmissionb73ee04ee3f9208894d2669790f6f17200825827a5b804e75e099c12c75a21b0device48cf2e19b6c5438694ce408bdf284342cd2d56a53719317bf19c016febaa01cdstarted from07e1e6258884267f477f66cd8ec473fe8aa4b74bbundlenoneapplied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8ed, 675701250ac528deb94d52baad28f0b09c8d8ff160a0f3e0bbb9dda51580fd73, 01d3b5c42ce5d09635567c54f1a41fb58fdf6add8e03893880f9707b88ffb909highA sole credit holder who redeems all but one base unit pins the floor on the fee residue; the owner has no remedy and anyone can stall sales indefinitely for about 1000 weisrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:265
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to passBetween epochs floorPrice() falls back to openingPrice, below the floor the closed epoch reached; the website will show a price going downsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:318
Reported by the independent tester; confirmed. The fix for the ratchet finding records only the owner-set opening price in minOpeningPrice and pays the whole reserve on the last redemption, so after a full redemption floorPrice() drops from the epoch's final floor to openingPrice and the owner may reopen anywhere at or above the old opening.
No holder is underpaid (nobody holds a backed token at that moment) and the README documents it as intended, so this is a note for the brief's 'never drops in price' wording and the website, not a defect: the displayed floor visibly decreases between epochs unless the owner raises openingPrice before the next sale (README 'Operational responsibilities').
README still says the manifest passes `$owner` and that no launch.json exists, contradicting the accepted launch.json which carries the static owner addressREADME.md:238
The manifest finding from the last round is fixed in launch.json (constructorArgs is now the static address 0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69, matching workflow.md line 5 and the single constructor parameter). The README was not updated: line 71 lists the launch value as
$ownerand lines 237-239 say the manifest passes$ownerand that the repository contains no launch.json.Documentation only; it does not affect deployment, but an operator reading the README would expect the paying wallet to become owner.
Read launch.json: constructorArgs == ["0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69"] and the file exists at the repository root.
Read README.md line 71 and 237-239: '
$owner= ...' and 'nolaunch.json'.Expected: README matches the manifest.
Actual: it describes the superseded $owner argument and denies the file exists.
- Reserve capture at zero supply (high): fixed.
Build contract projectAgent #1626 files changed2 attempts
#125Claudetests failed
The revision is complete, but with one important caveat: forge build and forge test could not be run on this machine. Every shell command this session failed before starting with the sandbox error below, so the verifier's run will be the first compile of these changes. I reviewed the edits by hand against the compiler rules and the proof's expectations.
apply-seccomp: write /proc/self/setgroups (nested userns is capability-restricted; caller must provide CAP_SYS_ADMIN): Permission deniedWhat I changed for the high finding (dust pin, id 7245…), in
src/RisingFloorVault.sol:- Minimum position. New owner-set
minPositionwith defaultDEFAULT_MIN_POSITIONof one whole 18-decimal token. A sell may not leave a nonzero credit below it in the seller's account, and a credit transfer applies the same rule to both the credit left behind and the credit received. A full exit is always allowed, so no setting locks anyone in. Quotes return zero for a refused redemption. Both proof scenarios now revert at the dust-leaving sell, which is the proof's pass branch. - Donation variant. Plain ETH is refused while the whole backed supply is below the minimum.
- Owner remedy. The minimum cannot stop a sub-minimum buy made before a large holder's full exit from inheriting that exit's fee. The new
forceRedeempays such a holder their whole credit at the floor, fee-free, clears the credit and leaves the others' floor unchanged or higher. The owner receives nothing. Refused ETH is escrowed per holder and collected withwithdrawPending, and the reserve excludes escrow.
Tests and docs. Twelve new unit tests cover the 1000 wei scenario, exact-minimum remainders, full exits under a raised minimum, transfer rules, dust donations, and all forceRedeem paths including escrow and reentrancy. The tests that asserted the old dust behaviour were updated, the sell fuzz test asserts the refusal, and the invariant handler now drives minimum changes and forced redemptions with ETH conservation extended to escrow. README documents the minimum, the remedy as a trust assumption, the website duties and a new after-launch step. The ABI export was extended by hand.
Advisory findings. The between-epoch floor fallback is answered as disputed: it is the intentional alternative to the ratchet removed last round, and the README already tells the owner how to carry a floor over. The README manifest wording is fixed: it now names the static owner address and explains that launch.json is written by the manifest assignment, not by this tree.
All three answers are in
.imd-responses.json. The previous attempt's console ambiguity error did not come from anything in this tree, whose forge-std is the standard v1.9.7 alias, so nothing inlib/was touched.ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 101 turns · 22m 53s · 642 in · 105.4K out · 2.7M cachedsubmissionea19945ffcc60d859efbc61de9ce953d2153532b8a775ad5fe9d645e094ab6b9device27168b1ff68f84d222c33c9caedd445b1ce14d8429cb7647d95146490b6d392cstarted fromcd2745c4230e631789d69587aea50efaf2ffd120bundle5e2d1f634d1c47c30fa7c8daccd89c004dd1efafb4849a5274142ac09a8efe0a · 531 KBchanged · 6 filesREADME.mddocs/abi/RisingFloorVault.jsonsrc/RisingFloorVault.soltest/RisingFloorVault.invariant.t.soltest/RisingFloorVault.t.soltest/mocks/Actors.sol#162Claude6 files changed
Everything passes and the revision is complete.
Finding 1 (high, dust-pinned floor): fixed. The proof reproduced on the starting tree with the exact values reported. The fix in
src/RisingFloorVault.solapplies both remedies the reviewer suggested:- No dust left behind. A partial redemption or a credit transfer can no longer leave any account with a nonzero credit worth less than the new constant
MIN_POSITION_VALUE(0.01 ETH) at the floor before the operation. It reverts withPositionTooSmall. Full redemptions of any size and buys of any size still work, so the proof's 1000 wei buy succeeds and the pare-down to one unit is refused. A new viewminRemainingCredit()tells the website the threshold, which shrinks as the floor rises. Donations against a reserve below the same minimum are refused. - Owner remedy.
forceRedeem(address[] holders)clears each listed credit and pays its exact pro-rata share of the reserve, the floor with no fee, into an escrow only that holder can withdraw viawithdrawPayout(to). Holders keep their tokens, nobody else's floor moves, and clearing the last credit empties the reserve so the opening price can be set again.reserve()now excludes the escrow.
The invariant suite caught a self-transfer double-count in my first draft of the new credit-transfer check. That is fixed and has a regression test.
Finding 2 (info, floor display between epochs): disputed. The behaviour reproduces but is the documented design. Carrying the final floor into the next opening was the ratchet removed last round, and no holder exists when the displayed value changes.
Finding 3 (info, README manifest wording): fixed. The constructor table and Deployment section now state the static owner address and that the manifest assignment writes
launch.json.Verification, with Foundry 1.5.1 and solc 0.8.26 downloaded into the scratch directory:
Check Result Reviewer's proof (copied under test/scratch) 2 passed forge testwith the verifier's fuzz seed80 unit/fuzz + 6 invariants passed forge testwith a random seedall passed forge build --force,forge fmt --checkclean, contract 8,095 bytes Files changed: the contract, both test files, the reentrancy mock, the regenerated ABI export at
docs/abi/RisingFloorVault.json, the README, and.imd-responses.jsonanswering all three findings.One limit remains and is documented in the README: a holder with capital can still raise the floor by donating or by buying dust and letting others' fees accrue to it. That now costs locked capital rather than nothing, and
forceRedeemclears it. If the owner renounces ownership, that remedy goes away with the rest of the configuration.ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 95 turns · 20m 32s · 1.1K in · 86.6K out · 4.3M cachedsubmissiond5ad347255ae3390bad67c414bea5d800cf7cc9f62e810405fb5a15d29fdd31adevice803eeae3d8b63de342abf5c1621b903ebc38796b2e6904b6b88e609c2a9d8dc5started fromcd2745c4230e631789d69587aea50efaf2ffd120bundlee3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8ed · 531 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·changed · 6 filesREADME.mddocs/abi/RisingFloorVault.jsonsrc/RisingFloorVault.soltest/RisingFloorVault.invariant.t.soltest/RisingFloorVault.t.soltest/mocks/Actors.sol- Minimum position. New owner-set
ManifestAgent #18761 file changed
The manifest is verified and updated. Only
launch.jsonchanged.What I checked
- The accepted source in
src/RisingFloorVault.solstill has a single constructor parameter, the owner address. The ABI export in docs/abi agrees. - The brief states the owner wallet explicitly, so the manifest keeps it as the static address rather than
$owner. The factory receives no privileges. - The manifest has exactly kind, contracts and notes, one contract entry with one string argument, and notes under the 4000-character limit.
forge buildsucceeds andforge testwith the verifier's fuzz seed passes all 81 tests.
What I changed
The other contributor's revision added an owner privilege, forced redemption at full floor value into per-holder escrow. The notes now list the owner's privileges, including that one, and state what the owner cannot do: withdraw reserve ETH or pause redemptions. The contract entry and constructor argument are unchanged.
Next
Services take this manifest through publication, attestation, admission and deployment on Ethereum mainnet.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 12 turns · 1m 37s · 226 in · 4.1K out · 250K cachedsubmission96ab4b9258ae1c1af5fa2cd2efd82316fca684c30872ccf3551abf2a007e7927device03845cacb54c3a737bb490638adf9db97b70c1ddeedd2fd50a31e67223e19ceastarted from6ae1f3224dea6e7442172a78e53d4d0959400233bundle01d3b5c42ce5d09635567c54f1a41fb58fdf6add8e03893880f9707b88ffb909 · 533 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·applied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edchanged · 1 filelaunch.jsonmay writelaunch.json- The accepted source in
Write foundry testsAgent #1942 files changed
The revision is complete and verified. Summary of what I found and did:
Why the suite was failing. The implementation was revised after my previous round. It added a dust rule (
MIN_POSITION_VALUE,PositionTooSmall), a donation minimum (ReserveBelowMinimum), owner-drivenforceRedeeminto an escrow, andwithdrawPayout. Five of my fuzz tests and all seven sequence invariants failed on those new refusals.What changed in
test/RisingFloorVault.edges.t.sol(67 tests, up from 51):- The five failing fuzz tests now predict the exact
PositionTooSmallrevert and check that a refused call moved nothing, instead of skipping those inputs. - New boundary tests for the dust rule: exactly the minimum passes and one unit less fails, for partial sales, top-ups of a dust recipient, whole dust positions, and self-transfers.
- New escrow tests: a duplicate holder in the list reverts the whole call atomically, all holders in one call split exactly the reserve, escrow is excluded from floor, ask, bid, quotes and the next epoch's opening, a forced redemption that drains the reserve under the minimum blocks donations and blocks a payout routed back into the vault, a payout routed into the vault while supply is outstanding becomes a donation, re-entry from the payout hook into
withdrawPayoutorbuyis blocked, andforceRedeemis refused to the pending owner, holders, and the old owner after renouncing. - A fuzz property that every wei paid in comes back out across a forced redemption, the remaining holders' exits, and the escrow withdrawal.
What changed in
test/RisingFloorVault.sequences.invariant.t.sol: the handler now predicts the dust and donation-minimum refusals, and drivesforceRedeemover random subsets of holders (asserting pro-rata payouts in list order and whole-call refusal on any holder without credit) andwithdrawPayoutto random recipients. ETH conservation now covers the escrow, and token conservation accounts for tokens whose credit was ended.Results. All 149 tests pass with the verifier's seed and with a random seed. The sequence run made 8192 calls with zero unpredicted reverts, including 403 forced redemptions and 415 escrow withdrawals.
forge buildandforge fmt --checkare clean.Findings. I found no defect in the revised implementation that had to be tested around, so no findings file was written. One quirk is documented in a test rather than reported: a self-transfer of credit is refused when the remainder between debit and credit would be dust, even though it would change nothing. It is harmless and consistent with the stated rule.
The changes are in the working tree and uncommitted, as the brief did not ask for a commit.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 50 turns · 12m 16s · 898 in · 51.7K out · 3.3M cachedsubmissionc35ab17d924ed5a11063af3087ee4411d8d5630b3ba4223683a88a71aca2e15bdevicef5666f1d1aa756784a8b11cb24c6b11ba1d751dca015f7dc74292aa3a4c4cb5astarted fromb8eba09ae955bf86f6a186d61aed23d379c6c729bundle675701250ac528deb94d52baad28f0b09c8d8ff160a0f3e0bbb9dda51580fd73 · 562 KBverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·applied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8edchanged · 2 filestest/RisingFloorVault.edges.t.soltest/RisingFloorVault.sequences.invariant.t.solmay writetesttest/**- The five failing fuzz tests now predict the exact
Audit judgeAgent #999found 1 medium
judge findings unresolved after 2 revisions: no revision budget left for build_contract_project (2 revisions, 2 from the judge) — Reserve is address(this).balance, so ETH forced in without a call bypasses the new ReserveBelowMinimum guard and pins the floor on a dust position for gas only; the owner's forceRedeem clears it but h
The review is written to
.imd-findings.jsonand no tracked file changed.Settlement of last round
- High, dust pin (id 7245387d…): fixed. My proof now passes on the revised tree. A partial redemption or credit transfer can no longer leave a remainder below
minRemainingCredit(), and the owner has a working remedy inforceRedeem, which pays each listed holder its exact pro-rata share into an escrow only that holder can withdraw. I traced the escrow accounting, the pro-rata rounding (others' floor never falls), and the self-transfer fix. - Info, floor falls back to openingPrice between epochs: dropped. The author's dispute holds. Only owner-set prices land in
minOpeningPrice, nobody holds a backed token at the moment the displayed value changes, and the README and a test document the behaviour as intended. - Info, README still said
$owner: fixed. The constructor table and Deployment section now state the static address the brief names, and correctly say the manifest step writes launch.json. The merged launch.json has only the three schema keys, one contract, one static constructor argument matching the brief, and notes consistent with the code.
One new finding, medium. The donation guard added in the fix is bypassable.
receive()refuses ETH against a reserve below the minimum, but the reserve isaddress(this).balance, so ETH forced in through a selfdestruct is counted with no guard. A griefer buys 1000 wei of tokens at the opening price, forces in 1e6 wei, and the ask jumps to about 1000 times the opening price. Their ETH is fully recoverable, so the cost is gas. The owner can clear it withforceRedeem, which escrows the ETH back to the griefer, who re-pins in the next block. No funds are lost and the floor-only-rises invariant holds, which is why the suite does not see it. The attached proof fails on this tree and passes on a copy that accounts the reserve internally instead of reading the balance. The README's claim that forced ETH harms nobody is true only when a real position is outstanding.Verification done
- Project suite passes: 149 tests including 6 invariants.
- Protected CREATE2 rehearsal passes with the manifest's constructor argument. Init code is 8,405 bytes, well under the limits, with no forbidden opcodes.
- The exported ABI is identical to the compiled ABI.
- All 16 entry points answered in the coverage record, 15 hold and
receive()carries the finding. The static-analysis leads were all benign: the strict equalities are supply-is-zero branches, the uninitialized local is zero by default, and the reentrancy lead is a view call on the trusted token undernonReentrant.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 27 turns · 7m 34s · 450 in · 31.3K out · 1.4M cachedsubmissionbb94945396c14934f4fd1c477662437af64c5cb42af81b672003d1a131333f97device99c6d0bcc495ad613a6a5093465f2cc2d3ac6a53d90273d31b81cfc62f92c524started from19019ab7aa3e7f5487fdac367ee5e87547cd7a4abundlenoneapplied one3e1f89ce744378e884dc3e4a457f91cb9132092fbbbf8558a6b6b35d760b8ed, 675701250ac528deb94d52baad28f0b09c8d8ff160a0f3e0bbb9dda51580fd73, 01d3b5c42ce5d09635567c54f1a41fb58fdf6add8e03893880f9707b88ffb909mediumReserve is address(this).balance, so ETH forced in without a call bypasses the new ReserveBelowMinimum guard and pins the floor on a dust position for gas only; the owner's forceRedeem clears it but hsrc/RisingFloorVault.sol:471
proof · a Foundry test the fix has to pass
- High, dust pin (id 7245387d…): fixed. My proof now passes on the revised tree. A partial redemption or credit transfer can no longer leave a remainder below
- Contracts publishedidentity-md-launches/launch-1977-workflow-contract-stage-context
DeployedNeeds attentionfindings: 1 blocking finding(s) never resolved — audit_judge: Reserve is address(this).balance, so ETH forced in without a call bypasses the new ReserveBelowMinimum guard and pins the floor on a dust position for gas only; the owner's forceRedeem clears it but h
- rebuilt
- RisingFloorVault · verifier 0.1.0 · solc 0.8.26
- gates
- 6 of 7 passed
- provenance
- findings
- independent review
- bytecode
- manifest
- protected invariants
- economics
- parked
- findings: 1 blocking finding(s) never resolved — audit_judge: Reserve is address(this).balance, so ETH forced in without a call bypasses the new ReserveBelowMinimum guard and pins the floor on a dust position for gas only; the owner's forceRedeem clears it but h
- proof
commit, attestation, manifest, tree, per-contract hashes
- repository
- identity-md-launches/launch-1977-workflow-contract-stage-context
- commit
- 18dc5fad75066f209f658c74241c3afe3a22dbf7
- attestation
- 1645e263a7ded121c1db611e4d1318027678f815264cbbdc81c51c4e5cbab1dc
- manifest
- 8098825acf7577e78c3451db664fb336c957d5785437f11aeac71ea23eb6f2be
- constructor
- RisingFloorVault: 0xd3f26a6be348440110161dfd5748e7de7b08cf69
- tree
- 74dc6c0dec8fb69111346db1aa1769552806ffdc
- compiler
- solc 0.8.26, optimizer 200 runs, reproducible
- contract
- RisingFloorVault
src/RisingFloorVault.sol · 8373 bytes
creation 1893d0eec703676ae6a1cd8f7b7f71cef1fa8425c8707d38be66e18d251cbc6b
abi bdccb124b12408139601cd61bdf62ebd7de72409587e62cb0e16a8cbb250ec60
metadata 60ae5f398a28456d10122dd474ce1e7ba085a013472855aee627aba5fe126b42
- Website built
- Website published
- Hosted
- Checked