Done. launch.json is the only new file; no tracked file was modified. The other untracked entries in git status are sandbox device nodes and harness files that existed before this task.

What I wrote

The manifest describes exactly the two deployable contracts in the accepted tree:

• Token: LaunchToken with name "The Room", symbol "ROOM", 18 decimals. Its constructor takes no arguments and mints the whole supply to msg.sender, matching what the protected token floor asserts.
• Contracts: one entry, Room, with empty constructorArgs. The compiled ABI confirms Room has no constructor. RoomLayout and Agent1 are internal libraries inlined into Room, so they are not listed as deployments.
• Pool: native ETH pairing, fee 3000, tick spacing 60, initialPrice sqrtPriceX96 for 1:1, no hook.
• Notes: a summary of Room's behaviour, the token's properties, the size budgets and where they are asserted.

Verification

The schema check was a local script reproducing the LaunchManifest rules from the reference, since the protocol package is not in this repo.

The findings file is in place at the repository root, excluded from git by the harness as intended. No other files were changed.

Verdict: no blocking defects. The implementation and tests hold up. I found one low-severity documentation inconsistency and four informational notes.

What I verified

• Build, 34 tests, and forge fmt --check all pass offline.
• Both protected floor suites pass when run in a scratch project against the real creation code of LaunchToken and Room, with CREATE2 addresses computed for a stand-in factory. Supply lands entirely on the factory, decimals match, no forbidden opcodes.
• The committed room.svg is byte-identical to the live render() output, and parses as well-formed XML.
• Every size figure in the README and REVIEW.md is exact: room 1,133 bytes, agent 1,294 bytes, image 2,433 bytes, Room runtime 6,552 bytes, token runtime 1,323 bytes.
• Exported ABIs in docs/abi/ match the compiled contracts.
• Room runtime has no CALL, STATICCALL, DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE, SELFDESTRUCT or SSTORE. No receive or fallback, so ETH is rejected.
• Agent geometry: no element overlaps the desk top, legs, nameplate, window, or sign at any of the six desk positions, including a hypothetical row-2 agent against row-1 furniture and neighbouring agents. No submodules.

Findings, ranked

1. Low. STYLE.md says nothing may go above y = -60, but Agent1's antenna circle reaches -60.5. The reference drawing breaks the rule later builders are told to follow. Documentation fix only.
2. Info. README's instructions for regenerating room.svg point at a nonexistent test/scratch/ directory, and fs_permissions = [] rules out the file-writing alternative.
3. Info. No test pins render() to room.svg. They match now, but later parts have no guard against a stale image. A keccak constant in a test would close this without config changes.
4. Info. REVIEW.md reports 35 tests; the suite has 34.
5. Info. The Sepolia deployment the brief asks for was not performed, which is consistent with the network rule that contributor tasks never broadcast. The step remains open for the network deployer.